Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 22;281(1779):20132180. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2180

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Female mass development depending on their relatedness to the offspring (0, 33, 66 and 100% foster treatment) and for females without brood. Females caring for sibling broods (0 and 100% foster) lost weight and there was a difference with females of the 100% foster treatment losing significantly more mass than females caring for 66% foster offspring (a and b express the statistical difference, Wilcoxon multiple comparisons p < 0.05).