Table 3.
NO. | Year of Collection | Similaritiesa |
---|---|---|
S 1 | November, 2008 | 0.905 |
S 2 | November, 2008 | 0.894 |
S 3 | September, 2009 | 0.913 |
S 4 | September, 2009 | 0.957 |
S 5 | October, 2009 | 0.962 |
S 6 | October, 2009 | 0.943 |
S 7 | November, 2009 | 0.898 |
S 8 | November, 2009 | 0.901 |
S 9 | September, 2010 | 0.931 |
S 10 | September, 2010 | 0.920 |
S 11 | October, 2010 | 0.932 |
S 12 | October, 2010 | 0.921 |
S 13 | November, 2010 | 0.899 |
S 14 | November, 2010 | 0.900 |
S 15 | September, 2011 | 0.934 |
S 16 | September, 2011 | 0.909 |
S 17 | October, 2011 | 0.928 |
S 18 | October, 2011 | 0.890 |
S 19 | November, 2011 | 0.916 |
S 20 | November, 2011 | 0.929 |
The reference fingerprint was developed with the median of all chromatograms