Table 4.
Comparisons of the median CN of ZNF280BY among 15 cattle breeds
| ANG | BMA | BRM | BSW | CHL | GIR | HFD | JER | LMS | NEL | NRC | QCI | RGU | SGT | HOS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANG |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BMA |
nsd |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BRM |
nsd |
nsd |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BSW |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CHL |
** |
** |
nsd |
* |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GIR |
* |
** |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HFD |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
* |
* |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JER |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
** |
* |
nsd |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LMS |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NEL |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
| NRC |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
** |
** |
nsd |
nsd |
* |
nsd |
- |
|
|
|
|
| QC |
nsd |
* |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
* |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
** |
- |
|
|
|
| RGU |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
nsd |
** |
** |
nsd |
* |
* |
* |
nsd |
** |
- |
|
|
| SGT |
** |
*** |
nsd |
* |
nsd |
nsd |
** |
** |
nsd |
nsd |
** |
nsd |
*** |
- |
|
| HOS | ** | ** | nsd | nsd | *** | *** | nsd | *** | *** | *** | nsd | *** | nsd | *** | - |
Note: nsd: no significant difference; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. The full name of each breed is listed in Table 1.