Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 2;11(1):626–642. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110100626

Table 4.

Multilevel logistic regression odds ratio predicting obesity for black women and men.

Black Women ( N = 3,126) Black Men ( N = 1,164)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Neighborhood-level Measures
Percent black ≥ 25% 1.10 1.03 0.95 0.93 0.90 0.87 0.87 0.95
[0.89–1.37] [0.76–1.29] [0.74–1.22] [0.72–1.20] [0.64–1.27] [0.60–1.25] [0.59–1.28] [0.63–1.43]
Social cohesion 0.77 + 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.87
[0.59–1.00] [0.66–1.27] [0.67–1.29] [0.60–1.41] [0.53–1.56] [0.51–1.50]
Socioeconomic status 0.88 + 0.90 1.01 1.01
[0.76–1.01] [0.77–1.05] [0.79–1.28] [0.78–1.29]
Street connectivity 1.00 1.00
[1.00–1.00] [1.00–1.00]
Park accessibility 0.93 1.21
[0.77–1.13] [0.95–1.56]
Residential stability 0.47 + 0.53 0.44 + 0.45 + 1.42 1.51 1.53 1.32
[0.20–1.10] [0.23–1.24] [0.18–1.08] [0.19–1.16] [0.37–5.44] [0.40–5.72] [0.41–5.77] [0.35–5.00]
Individual-level Measures
Age 1.14 *** 1.14 *** 1.14 *** 1.14 *** 1.17 *** 1.17 *** 1.17 *** 1.17 ***
[1.10–1.17] [1.10–1.17] [1.10–1.17] [1.10–1.17] [1.11–1.24] [1.11–1.24] [1.11–1.24] [1.11–1.24]
Age squared 1.00 *** 1.00 *** 1.00 *** 1.00 *** 1.00 *** 1.00 *** 1.00 *** 1.00 ***
[1.00–1.00] [1.00–1.00] [1.00–1.00] [1.00–1.00] [1.00–1.00] [1.00–1.00] [1.00–1.00] [1.00–1.00]
Married 0.79 * 0.79 * 0.79 * 0.80 * 0.90 1.07 1.07 1.08
[0.66–0.96] [0.66–0.96] [0.66–0.96] [0.66–0.97] [0.75–1.08] [0.79–1.46] [0.78–1.46] [0.79–1.47]
US born 1.86 ** 1.84 ** 1.82 ** 1.81 ** 2.52 ** 2.47 ** 2.48 ** 2.48 **
[1.25–2.76] [1.24–2.74] [1.22–2.71] [1.21–2.69] [1.30–4.89] [1.28–4.78] [1.28–4.80] [1.28–4.78]
Education a 0.78 *** 0.79 *** 0.80 *** 0.80 *** 0.85 + 0.86 + 0.86 + 0.86 +
[0.69–0.87] [0.71–0.88] [0.71–0.89] [0.71–0.90] [0.71–1.02] [0.72–1.03] [0.71–1.03] [0.72–1.03]
Income b 0.80 *** 0.81 *** 0.81 ** 0.81 ** 1.22 + 1.24 + 1.24 + 1.23 +
[0.71–0.90] [0.71–0.91] [0.72–0.91] [0.72–0.92] [0.97–1.53] [0.99–1.55] [0.99–1.56] [0.99–1.55]
Current smoker 0.67 *** 0.67 *** 0.67 *** 0.66 *** 0.55 ** 0.55 *** 0.55 ** 0.55 **
[0.55–0.82] [0.55–0.82] [0.55–0.81] [0.54–0.81] [0.39–0.77] [0.39–0.77] [0.39–0.77] [0.39–0.78]
Year 2008 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.92 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.01
[0.77–1.08] [0.77–1.09] [0.77–1.09] [0.77–1.09] [0.76–1.37] [0.77–1.38] [0.77–1.38] [0.76–1.36]
Level 2 variance 0.17 *** 0.17 ** 0.18 ** 0.17 ** 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.19
Intraclass correlation 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06
AIC 4,042.83 4,041.40 4,039.42 4,042.17 1,376.37 1,378.25 1,380.25 1,381.66
BIC 4,115.40 4,120.02 4,124.08 4,138.93 1,437.09 1,444.02 1,451.08 1,462.62

Note: 95% Confidence Intervals are in parentheses; a Education is treated as a continuous variable in the models. It has three levels: “high school or below”, “some college”, “college or above”; b Income is treated as a continuous variable in the models. It has three levels: “below 100% FPL”, “100–200% FPL”, “at or above 200% FPL”; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, + p < 0.10 (two-tailed test).