Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 14.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jul 24;5(195):195ra95. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005893

Figure 1. An integrative systems survey of sepsis survival and death.

Figure 1

(A) CONSORT flow chart of patient enrollment and selection. Patients presenting to emergency departments with suspected community-acquired sepsis (acute infection and ≥2 SIRS criteria) were grouped according to final adjudication (sepsis or SIRS, no infection), day 3 clinical course (septic shock, severe sepsis, and uncomplicated sepsis) and outcome at day 28 (survival or death). Groups were defined by the most severe stage of sepsis attained. A subset of cases were chosen for the derivation study based upon planned number (n=30) of patients per subgroup and enriched for etiologic agents and controlling for attributes defined by the sepsis nonsurvivor group. The validation group had limited number of sepsis nonsurvivors. 1 One sepsis nonsurvivor initially refused phlebotomy at t0, yet later agreed at t24. The sample was utilized to maximize validation predictive modeling studies. No non-infected SIRS validation samples were selected because predictive modeling was not successful during derivation. (B) Experimental design. MS-based metabolome and proteome analysis was performed on plasma samples obtained at t0 and t24 from 150 matched derivation subjects. Validation of metabolome findings was sought by semi-quantitative MS in an independent cohort comprising all remaining sepsis nonsurvivors and a matched group of sepsis survivors at t0 and t24 (n=52). Following molecular integration and analysis, predictive models were developed that were representative of the clinical and molecular findings. A top model utilizing semi-quantitative metabolomics clinical measures was trained at t0, and then tested against the derivation t24 group, validation groups (Vt0, Vt24) and an independent validation (RoCI) cohort. The utility of the predictive models was further tested by clinical measures and targeted, quantitative assays of butyroylcarnitine, 2-methylbytyroylcarnitine, hexanoylcarnitine, cis-4-decenoylcarnitine, 1-arachidonoyl-glycerophosphocholine (GPC), 1-linoleoyl-GPC, pseudouridine, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)lactate (HPLA), 4-methyl-2-oxopentanoate, 3-methoxytyrosine and N-acetylthreonine of 382 samples, four samples were not included in a subset of metabolites due to limited serum volume. Tests included logistic regression of the top model derived by semi-quantitative results and Support Vector Machine (SVM) analysis of the top model.