Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: FEBS J. 2014 Jan;281(1):320–330. doi: 10.1111/febs.12599

Table 2.

EGFP-targeting siRNA sequences selected for this study, sorted by algorithm rank.

5'Target Position siRNA Sequence End 5' Nucleotides Thermodynamic ΔΔG (kcal/mol) Algorithm Rank Testing Rationale
Anti:Sense Rank
415 UGUACUCCAGCUUGUGCCC U:G 1 4.2 1 Highest algorithm ranking
416 UUGUACUCCAGCUUGUGCC U:G 1 2.1 17 Highest Dharm. rank (91)
274 UGCGCUCCUGGACGUAGCC U:G 1 0.8 38 On Ambion list
757 UGGGCAGCGUGCCAUCAUC U:G 1 −2.6 177 High end, low ΔΔG
306 CUUGUAGUUGCCGUCGUCC C:G 7 2.9 239 On Ambion list
396 CAGGAUGUUGCCGUCCUCC C:G 7 0.5 389 On Ambion list
126 GAUGAACUUCAGGGUCAGC G:G 10 1.9 418 On Ambion list
711 AUGGCUAAGCUUCUUGUAC A:G 2 −3.7 551 Low rank, high Dharm. (73)
783 CAUCCCGCUCUCCUGGGCA C:U 16 3.1 695 Low end, high ΔΔG
159 GGGCCAGGGCACGGGCAGC G:G 10 −2.3 700 On Ambion list
253 CGGGCAUGGCGGACUUGAA C:U 16 −5.2 824 Lowest algorithm rank