Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Nov 1;20(2):202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.10.023

Table 3.

Outcome after RIC/NMA HCT: multivariate analysis

Outcome Variable RR 95% CI P Value
Overall Survival Consolidation
No 1
Yes 0.886 0.71 – 1.10 0.28
Donor Source:
Matched Sibling 1
Matched URD 0.88 0.68 – 1.14 0.34
Partially matched URD 1.03 0.71 – 1.51 0.86
UCB 1.60 1.18 – 2.16 0.002
Cytogenetics
Intermediate 1
Unfavorable 1.74 1.36–2.22 <0.0001
Other/Missing 1.20 0.92 – 1.56 0.18
Age
<45 1
45–60 1.22 0.83 – 1.79 0.31
>60 1.51 1.03 – 2.2 0.03
Gender
Male 1
Female 0.78 0.63 – 0.97 0.02
TRM Consolidation
No 1
Yes 0.74 0.53 – 1.04 0.08
Donor Source
Matched Sibling 1
Matched URD 0.998 0.65 – 1.52 0.99
Partially matched URD 1.371 0.79 – 2.39 0.26
UCB 3.83 2.25 – 6.54 <0.0001
Conditioning
Flu/Bu 1
Flu/Mel 1.6 1.05 – 2.43 0.03
Flu/Other 0.65 0.38 – 1.14 0.13
TBI-based 0.94 0.56 – 1.6 0.80
Age
<45 1
45–60 1.2 0.63–2.28 0.58
>60 1.96 1.04–3.67 0.04
Gender
Male 1
Female 0.65 0.46–0.91 0.013
Relapse Consolidation
No 1
Yes 1.03 0.77–1.36 0.86
Cytogenetics
Intermediate 1
Unfavorable 1.87 1.38–2.5 <0.0001
Other/Missing 1.17 0.83 – 1.66 0.37
WBC
< 5.0 1
>= 5.0 0.77 0.59 – 0.99 0.05
DFS Consolidation
No 1
Yes 0.87 0.7–1.07 0.19
Cytogenetics
Intermediate 1
Unfavorable 1.65 1.29–2.1 <0.0001
Other/Missing 1.19 0.92 – 1.55 0.19
Gender
Male 1
Female 0.75 0.60–0.92 0.0071
Donor Source
Matched Sibling Donor 1
Matched URD 0.84 0.64 – 1.09 0.20
Partially matched URD 0.94 0.64 – 1.36 0.72
UCB 1.37 1.01 – 1.85 0.04

Note: Relapse and DFS models were stratified on ATG/Alemtuzumab use