Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Thromb Res. 2013 Dec 1;133(2):187–189. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.11.027

Table 1.

Demographic features

Subjects with APS (N = 30) Subjects with aPL (N = 72)
Gender
Male 3 (10.0%) 11 (15.3%)
Female 27 (90.0%) 61 (84.7%)
Ethnic group*
Caucasian 22 (73.3%) 50 (69.4%)
Afro-American 5 (16.7%) 13 (18.1%)
Hispanic 2 (6.7%) 4 (5.6%)
Others 1 (3.3%) 4 (5.6%)
Mean age 46.7 (± 12.0) 47.7 (± 12.0)
Primary APS/aPL 11 (33.3%) 19 (26.4%)
APS/aPL secondary to SLE 19 (63.3%) 53 (73.6%)
Elevated IgG (aCL) 12 (40.0%) 21 (29.2%)
Elevated IgM (aCL) 5 (16.7%) 22 (30.6%)
Positive LAC 18 (60.0%) 46 (63.9%)
Median IgG 42 ± 5.5 – 69.5 15.8 ± 4.4 – 73.9
Median IgM 21.8 ± 4.1 – 64.9 24.5 ± 5.4 – 66.5

APS = antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

aPL = antiphospholipid antibodies

SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus

aCL = anticardiolipin antibodies

LAC = lupus anticoagulant

*

Ethnicity of 1 subject with aPL is unknown.

4 subjects with symptomatic APS and 6 subjects with asymptomatic APS had more than one elevated or positive marker.

In the subjects with symptomatic APS: 7 subjects had missing aCL values. 1 subject had only one value of IgG. 3 subjects had only one value of IgM. 3 subjects had only one value of both IgG and IgM. 4 subjects had only one value of LAC.

In the subjects with asymptomatic APS: 2 subjects had missing aCL values. 1 subject had missing LAC values. 1 subject had only one value of IgM. 4 subjects had only one value of LAC.