Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 14;9(2):e88886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088886

Table 3. Comparison of several items between two methods with 12 specimens.

Comparison items
Methods successful rate (once experiment) workload Time consumption per batch Cost per batch
Improved Sanger sequencing 100% Light 8 h $420
Conventional Sanger sequencing 100% Heavy 11 h $400