Table 3. Satisfaction (intervention+control; N=44) and self-reported applicability (intervention only; N=20) as a result of training with the G-eCPD module.
95% CI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Mean | Low | High | SD |
Satisfaction | ||||
Would recommend the module to a colleaguea | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 1.1 |
Content of the module is relevant for a GP | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 1.1 |
Content of the knowledge test is relevant for a GP | 4.1 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 1.0 |
Global score (1–10) | 7.9 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 1.3 |
Time spent on the module (minutes) | 124 | 115 | 132 | 27 |
Applicability | ||||
Recognize patient with genetic disease sooner | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 0.98 |
Sooner refer to or discuss with a genetic specialist | 2.7 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 1.2 |
More knowledge of possibilities/limitations of genetic tests | 2.9 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 0.96 |
More knowledge of genetic diseases | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.1 | 0.98 |
More knowledge of basic genetic concepts | 3.3 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 0.96 |
More knowledge of genetic information sources | 3.8 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 0.88 |
Proportion of trainees applying the learned knowledge (%) | ||||
Daily | 0 | |||
Weekly | 5 | |||
Monthly | 90 | |||
Not (do not meet any genetic problems in our practice) | 5 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; G-eCPD, Genetic online Continuing Professional Development; GP, general practitioner.
If not indicated otherwise, results refer to scores of five-point Likert scale items (1=competely disagree, 5=completely agree).