Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 14;76(2):401–430. doi: 10.1007/s11538-013-9925-3

Table 5.

We calculated univariate confidence intervals for parameter estimates by allowing 10 % deterioration of fitness value

Parameter Interval In percent
EXP(log10(tumour volume T diag)) [T diag−0.028;T diag+0.023] [−0.3 %;+0.2 %]
EXP(immunogenicity ρ) [ρ−5⋅10−4;ρ+6⋅10−4] [−0.6 %;+0.8 %]
EXP(tumour growth α) [α−9⋅10−4;α+7⋅10−4] [−0.8 %;+0.7 %]
EXP(chemosensitivity k T) [k T−0.022;k T+0.025] [−0.9 %;+1.1 %]
effector toxicity k E [k E−2⋅10−4;k E+0.013] [−0.05 %;+2.7 %]
CHOEP exponent eff. tox e E [e E−0.141;e E+0.114] [−5.8 %;+4.7 %]
SD(immunogenicity ρ) [sd(ρ)−0.003;sd(ρ)+0.003] [−6.9 %;+7.1 %]
SD(log10(tumour volume) T diag) [sd(T diag)−0.041;sd(T diag)+0.030] [−8.8 %;+6.2 %]
CHOEP exponent chemosens e T [e T−0.061;e T+0.078] [−7.6 %;+9.8 %]
SD(chemosensitivity k T) [sd(k T)−0.069;sd(k T)+0.048] [−22.5 %;+15.6 %]
prop. hazard factor lhr [lhr−0.048;lhr+0.040] [−29.1 %;+24.1 %]