Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Thorax. 2013 Aug 12;69(1):55–62. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203631

Table 4.

Odds ratios for respiratory symptoms, according to spirometric category and stratified by ethnicity *

Spirometric Category White-Americans N=3,465 African-Americans N=1,821 Mexican-Americans N=1,716
Odds Ratios for Respiratory Symptoms (95% Confidence Interval) §
Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted
Normal 1.00
Airflow-limitation 2.70 (2.20, 3.32) 2.15 (1.70, 2.73) 1.41 (1.02, 1.94) 1.38 § (0.99, 1.92) 1.25 (0.90, 1.72) 1.26 § (0.90, 1.76)
Restrictive-pattern 2.67 (1.90, 3.76) 2.16 (1.51, 3.07) 1.41 (0.96, 2.08) 1.08 § (0.70, 1.67) 2.60 (1.92, 3.52) 2.12 (1.45, 3.08)
*

Missing data: White-Americans — 37 missing covariates and 4 missing respiratory symptoms; African-Americans — 39 missing covariates, 4 missing respiratory symptoms; Mexican-Americans — 30 missing covariates, 3 missing respiratory symptoms.

See footnote to Table 2 for description of spirometric category.

Odds ratios were calculated using three separate logistic regression models for each ethnic group. In the adjusted models, covariates included age, sex, smoking history, high cardiovascular risk, and health status.

§

Relative to White-Americans, there were significant interactions in African-American x airflow-limitation (p=0.003), African-American x restrictive-pattern (p=0.012), and Mexican-American x airflow-limitation (p=0.001), but no significant interaction in Mexican-American x restrictive-pattern (p=0.669).