Table 5.

Length of the specimen (LS), tumor size (TS) (cm), and number of harvested lymph nodes (N).

Study	Outcome (p)	ORHM1	ORHT2	LRH3	TLRH4
Stipa et al. [33]	LS; TS	NR5	NR
	N	NR	NR
Lindgren et al. [34]	LS; TS	NR	NR
	N	NR	NR
Brown et al. [35]	LS & TS	NR	NR
	N (NS)	10 (3–21)6	11 (6–19)
Lohsiriwat et al. [36]	TS		6.1 ± 2.67	5.7 ± 2.7
	N		18.8 ± 10.8 (7–47)7	29.2 ± 18.1 (5−66)
Tan et al. [37]	TS: ORH8 versus LRH (0.06)	ORH: Ø 4.359; TS length 4.359		Ø 3.9; TS length 4.2
	N: ORH versus LRH (0.174)	ORH 159		18
Veenhof et al. [38]	LS (0.09)		LS6 22 (17–26)10		LS 26 (22–32)
	TS (0.13)		TS 4 (3.4–5)10		TS 5 (3.3–6)
	N (0.49)		14 (8–19)10		15 (12–19)
Tanis et al. [39]	LS: ORHM versus LRH (0.06)	LS 26 (17–44)6	LS 25 (19–43)	LS 22 (8–40)
	N: ORHM versus LRH (0.63)	13.5 (2–38)6	13 (5–36)	15 (1–28)

¹Open right hemicolectomy median incision.

²Open right hemicolectomy transverse incision.

³LRH laparoscopic assisted right hemicolectomy.

⁴TLRH totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

⁵Not reported.

⁶Median (range).

⁷Mean ± SD (standard deviation).

⁸Open right hemicolectomy.

⁹Mean.

¹⁰Median (IQR: interquartile range).