Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 15;7(2):619–630.

Table 2.

Correlation between Per1 and Per2 expression and clinicopathological variables of the 246 gastric cancer cases

Characteristics Per1 P-value Per2 P-valuea


Low No. cases (%) High No. cases (%) Low No. cases (%) High No. cases (%)
Gender 0.144 1.000
    Female 43 (30.1) 22 (21.4) 42 (26.2) 23 (26.7)
    Male 100 (69.9) 81 (78.6) 118 (73.8) 63 (73.3)
Size (cm) 0.789 0.784
    ≤ 5.0 91 (63.6) 63 (61.2) 99 (68.9) 55 (64.0)
    > 5.0 52 (36.4) 40 (38.8) 61 (38.1) 31 (36.0)
Age (years) 0.897 0.789
    ≤ 60 77 (53.8) 54 (52.4) 84 (52.5) 47 (54.7)
    > 60 66 (46.2) 49 (47.6) 76 (47.5) 39 (45.3)
Location 1.000 0.687
    Upper 63 (40.1) 45 (43.7) 72 (45.0) 36 (41.9)
    Middle/lower 80 (59.9) 58 (56.3) 88 (55.0) 50 (58.1)
Clinical Stage < 0.001 0.021
    I + II 19 (13.3) 44 (42.7) 33 (20.6) 30 (34.9)
    III + IV 124 (86.7) 59 (57.3) 127 (79.4) 56 (65.1)
Depth of invasion < 0.001 0.007
    T1 + T2 14 (9.8) 34 (33.0) 23 (14.4) 25 (29.1)
    T3 + T4 129 (90.2) 69 (67.0) 137 (85.6) 61 (70.9)
Lymph node metastasis < 0.001 0.413
    Negative 19 (13.3) 33 (32.0) 31 (19.4) 21 (24.4)
    Positive 124 (86.7) 70 (68.0) 129 (80.6) 65 (75.6)
Pathologic differentiation < 0.001 0.239
    Well + Moderate differentiation adenocarcinoma 22 (15.4) 49 (47.6) 42 (26.2) 29 (33.7)
    Poor differentiation adenocarcinoma 121 (84.6) 54 (52.4) 118 (73.3) 57 (66.3)
a

p value < 0.05.