Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2013 Nov 8;58:70–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.10.018

Table 3.

Change in Screening Rates baseline to 6-month assessment, by study group when provider recommended screening, Kentucky, U.S.A., 2005–2009

Screening Study Group Baseline 6-month follow-up Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up p-value
N* % Yes N* % Yes
FOBT results documented Early 317 38.2 249 79.5 41.3% .82
Delayed 359 29.5 304 75.7 46.2
Colonoscopy results documented Early 804 59.0 735 74.7 15.7 .01
Delayed 856 61.0 773 63.4 2.4
Any Screening 06completed Early 914 62.9 833 79.6 16.7 .06
Delayed 967 61.7 863 71.2 9.5
*

N is the number of observations where screening was recommended and a screening result was not missing