Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 17.
Published in final edited form as: Leuk Lymphoma. 2012 Jul 9;54(1):138–144. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2012.701739

Tabe 2.

Pt # Dx Cellularity % Megs Druf Megs BM blasts MPO Esterase FAB Cytogenetics at diagnosis
1 Ph AML 70-80 decreased no 97 6% neg M1 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[20]
2 Ph AML 50-60 decreased no 65 neg neg M0 46,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[19]
3 Ph AML 40-50 usual no 63 68% neg M4 46,XY,der(7)inv(7)(q11.2q36)del(7)(q22q31),
t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[19]/46,XY[1]
4 Ph AML 90-100 decreased no 82 36% 2% M2 46,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[1]/45,XY,
-7,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[18]/46,XY[1]
5 Ph AML 95-100 decreased no 87 70% 5% M1 46,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[20]
6 Ph AML 90-100 usual no 60 40% neg M2 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[20]
7 Ph AML 70-80 usual no 69 70 40% M4 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[18]/46,XX[1]
8 Ph AML 50-60 increased yes 33 1 2% M7 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[20]
9 Ph AML 80-90 absent NA 88 1 neg M0 46,XY,der(9)inv(9)(p12q13)t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[3]
/46,XY, inv(9)[7]
10 CML BP 95-100 decreased yes 76 6 neg M2 46,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[17]/46,XY[3]
11 CML BP 70-80 decreased yes 36 40 neg M2 46,XX,t(8;11)(p11.2;p15),t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[20]
12 CML BP 95-100 decreased no 64 1 neg M0 55,XY,+8,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2),+13,+14,+14,+16,
+18,+19,+20,+der(22)t(9;22)[6]/46,XY[14]
13 CML BP 30-40 increased yes 65 neg neg M2 46,X,-Y,+8,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[6]/46,X,
- Y,+8,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2),inv(16)(p13q22)[7]/
47,XY,+Y[2]/46,XY[5]
14 CML BP 95-100 increased yes 38 20 neg M7 46,XY,t(3;21)(q26.2;q22),del(7)(q22),
t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) [2]/46,XY,t(3;21)(q26.2;q22),
t(4;15)(p16;q22),del(7)(q22),t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[5]/
46,XY,t(3;14)(q27;q24),t(3;21)(q26.2;q22),del(7)
(q22),t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[5]/46,XX[11]