Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2013 Dec 15;128(1):25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.11.001

Table 3.

Correlation coefficients (p-values) between speech sound accuracy (Percent Consonants Correct-Late 8) and average gray and white matter values in the regions in which the two groups differed

L-STG gray R-STG gray CC white R-LOG white
 PCC-Late 8 -.37 (.001) -.28 (.013) -.31 (.006) .449 (<. 001)
 LSTG gray .63 (<.001) .07 (.52) -.19 (.106)
 RSTG gray .01 (.98) -.24 (.035)
 CC white -.11 (.331)
Nonparametric correlations for Speech Sound Error Group only (n=23):
 PCC-Late 8 .00 (.98) .22 (.31) .08 (.72) .32 (.14)

Note: Values in the top of the table reflect Pearson correlations based on n=54 TS and n=23 SSE participants. Values in the bottom row reflect the nonparametric (Spearman’s rho) correlation coefficient for PCC-Late 8 values for only the SSE group. p-values are listed in parentheses. PCC-Late 8=Percent consonants correct-late 8; L-STG=Left superior temporal gyrus; R-STG=Right superior temporal gyrus; CC=Corpus callosum; R-LOG= Right lateral occipital gyrus; SSE=Speech sound error.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure