Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 30;2014:507076. doi: 10.1155/2014/507076

Table 4.

Face validity (training capacity).

Questions Group 1
Novice
(n = 15)
Group 2
Intermediate
(n = 14)
Group 3
Expert
(n = 13)
Mean
(n = 42)
Training capacity simulator in general
(1 = very bad…5 = very good)
4.7 ± 0.5 4.8 ± 0.4 4.5 ± 0.5 4.6 ± 0.5
Training capacity simulator regarding
(1 = very bad…5 = very good)
 Eye-hand coordination 4.5 ± 0.5 4.5 ± 0.9 4.5 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.7
 Camera navigation 4.3 ± 1.1 4.5 ± 0.7 4.6 ± 0.9 4.6 ± 0.9
 Instrument navigation 4.1 ± 1.1 4.6 ± 0.5 4.5 ± 0.5 4.4 ± 0.8
 Use of pedals and clutch 4.5 ± 1.1 4.6 ± 0.6 4.7 ± 0.5 4.6 ± 0.8
The simulator is useful for training
(1 = very unuseful…5 = very useful)
 Junior residents (postgraduate year 1–3) 4.5 ± 1.1 4.5 ± 1.2 4.9 ± 0.3 4.6 ± 0.9
 Senior residents (postgraduate year 4–6) 4.5 ± 0.6 4.4 ± 1.2 4.6 ± 0.8 4.5 ± 0.9
 Fellow's and regular consultants (starting robotics) 4.5 ± 0.7 4.9 ± 0.4 4.7 ± 0.6 4.7 ± 0.6
 Robotic experts 3.2 ± 1.3 3.4 ± 1.3 3.2 ± 1.5 3.3 ± 1.4
The simulator is useful for
(1 = very un useful…5 = very useful)
 Warmup for robotic surgery 3.9 ± 1.3 3.6 ± 1.5 2.7 ± 1.5 3.4 ± 1.4
 Retention of robotic skills 3.8 ± 1.1 4.0 ± 1.1 2.9 ± 1.6 3.6 ± 1.3

Values expressed in mean on a 1 to 5 Likert scale ± SD.