Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 10;14:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-23

Table 2.

Meta-analyses of the association between the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and the presence of IBS

 
Ethnicity
Cases/Controls
L vs S
 
 
LL vs SS
 
 
LL vs LS
 
 
      (OR,95% CI) P (Model) Bon (OR,95% CI) P (Model) Bon (OR,95% CI) P (Model) Bon
IBS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 25 studies
Overall
3443/3359
(0.993,0.867-1.138)
P = 0.923 (R)
1.000
(1.009,0.772-1.319)
P = 0.948 (R)
1.000
(1.284,1.040-1.585)
P = 0.020 (R)
0.120
 11 studies
Cau/M Cau
1855/1590
(1.008,0.859-1.183)
P = 0.919 (R)
1.000
(1.018,0.752-1.378)
P = 0.907 (R)
1.000
(1.288,1.079-1.536)
P= 0.005 (F)
0.030
 9 studies
East Asian
1138/1102
(1.151,0.901-1.471)
P = 0.261 (R)
1.000
(1.371,0.764-2.461)
P = 0.291 (R)
1.000
(1.528,0.849-2.751)
P = 0.157 (R)
0.942
 1 study
Turkish
54/92
(0.934,0.577-1.514)
P = 0.782
1.000
(0.727,0.271-1.952)
P = 0.527
1.000
(0.442,0.171-1.143)
P = 0.092
0.552
 2 studies
Indian
301/352
(0.687,0.375-1.259)
P = 0.225 (R)
1.000
(0.588,0.241-1.435)
P = 0.243 (R)
1.000
(1.077,0.669-1.733)
P = 0.761 (F)
1.000
 1 study
Mexian
45/123
(0.482,0.256-0.910)
P = 0.024
0.144
(0.290,0.082-1.030)
P = 0.056
0.336
(0.313,0.073-1.337)
P = 0.117
0.702
 1 study
Iranian
50/100
(1.083,0.670-1.751)
P = 0.744
1.000
(1.168,0.466-2.931)
P = 0.740
1.000
(2.246,0.976-5.165)
P = 0.057
1.000
IBS-C
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 20 studies
Overall
992/2437
(1.232,1.048-1.449)
P = 0.011 (R)
0.066
(1.570,1.147-2.148)
P= 0.005 (F)
0.030
(1.658,1.180-2.331)
P= 0.004 (R)
0.024
 8 studies
Cau/M Cau
462/841
(1.270,1.060-1.520)
P= 0.009 (F)
0.054
(1.627,1.109-2.388)
P = 0.013 (F)
0.078
(1.269,0.956-1.685)
P = 0.100 (F)
1.000
 8 studies
East Asian
393/1052
(1.487,1.139-1.941)
P= 0.003 (R)
0.018
(2.575,1.741-3.808)
P= 0.000 (F)
0.000
(3.084,2.017-4.715)
P= 0.000 (F)
0.000
 1 study
Turkish
26/92
(0.719,0.379-1.367)
P = 0.315
1.000
(0.545,0.156-1.903)
P = 0.342
1.000
(0.618,0.172-2.218)
P = 0.461
1.000
 2 studies
Indian
96/352
(0.798,0.438-1.452)
P = 0.460 (R)
1.000
(0.676,0.330-1.384)
P = 0.284 (F)
1.000
(0.769,0.389-1.522)
P = 0.451 (F)
1.000
 1 study
Iranian
15/100
(0.796,0.367-1.725)
P = 0.563
1.000
(0.730,0.181-2.951)
P = 0.659
1.000
(2.133,0.522-8.714)
P = 0.291
1.000
 IBS-D
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 21 studies
Overall
1454/2813
(0.932,0.771-1.126)
P = 0.466 (R)
1.000
(0.888,0.666-1.183)
P = 0.416 (R)
1.000
(1.209,0.973-1.502)
P = 0.086 (R)
0.516
 9 studies
Cau/M Cau
806/1270
(0.986,0.863-1.126)
P = 0.835 (F)
1.000
(0.921,0.706-1.200)
P = 0.540 (F)
1.000
(1.251,1.005-1.556)
P = 0.045 (F)
0.270
 8 studies
East Asian
434/999
(0.846,0.694-1.032)
P = 0.099 (F)
0.594
(0.785,0.498-1.239)
P = 0.299 (F)
1.000
(0.930,0.579-1.494)
P = 0.764 (F)
1.000
 1 study
Turkish
18/92
(1.087,0.529-2.232)
P = 0.820
1.000
(0.324,0.015-7.070)
P = 0.474
1.000
(0.046,0.003-0.814)
P = 0.036
0.216
 2 studies
Indian
171/352
(0.478,0.084-2.707)
P = 0.404 (R)
0.828
(0.494,0.069-3.514)
P = 0.481 (R)
1.000
(1.355,0.715-2.566)
P = 0.351 (F)
1.000
 1 study
Iranian
25/100
(1.325,0.710-2.471)
P = 0.377
1.000
(1.565,0.504-4.856)
P = 0.439
1.000
(3.333,1.159-9.586)
P = 0.025
0.150
IBS-M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 17 studies
Overall
486/2042
(1.087,0.911-1.296)
P = 0.354 (R)
1.000
(1.170,0.830-1.651)
P = 0.370 (R)
1.000
(1.313,0.991-1.740)
P = 0.058 (F)
0.348
 6 studies
Cau/M Cau
265/549
(1.096,0.754-1.593)
P = 0.630 (R)
1.000
(1.153,0.538-2.471)
P = 0.714 (R)
1.000
(1.533,1.069-2.198)
P = 0.020 (F)
0.120
 7 studies
East Asian
167/949
(1.030,0.785-1.351)
P = 0.830 (F)
1.000
(1.135,0.637-2.022)
P = 0.667 (F)
1.000
(0.906,0.507-1.617)
P = 0.737 (F)
1.000
 1 study
Turkish
10/92
(2.038,0.795-5.225)
P = 0.138
0.828
(4.909,0.480-50.178)
P = 0.180
1.000
(0.773,0.175-3.415
P = 0.734
1.000
 2 studies
Indian
34/352
(1.022,0.616-1.697)
P = 0.932 (F)
1.000
(1.157,0.452-2.965)
P = 0.761 (F)
1.000
(1.684,0.662-4.280
P = 0.274 (F)
1.000
 1 study Iranian 10/100 (1.041,0.415-2.610) P = 0.932 1.000 (1.095,0.141-8.485) P = 0.931 1.000 (0.889,0.166-4.755 P = 0.891 1.000

Cau/M Cau: Caucasian/Mostly Caucasian; F: fixed model; R: random model; Bon: P for Bonferroni adjustment. The significant contrasts were written in bold.