Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan;12(1):40–49. doi: 10.2450/2013.0088-13

Table III.

Estimation of blood management costs and cost savings in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty, managed with 600 mg intravenous iron sucrose (IS) or ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), compared to those from the control group.

N. Cost scenarios

ALO-1 ALO-2 ALO-3
Blood management costs
Control
Without ARCT (€/patient) 134 0 0 0
With ARCT(€/patient) 48 521 841 1,161
Mean cost (€/patient) 182 137.5 221.9 306.3
Range 0–972 0–1,292 0–1,612

IS (600 mg)
Without ARCT (€/patient) 117 105 105 105
With ARCT (€/patient) 17 562 882 1,202
Mean cost (€/patient) 134 163.0 203.6 244.2
Range 105–834 105–1,154 105–1,474

FCM (600 mg)
Without ARCT (€/patient) 44 138 138 138
With ARCT (€/patient) 4 745 1,065 1,385
Mean cost (€/patient) 48 188.6 215.3 241.9
Range 138–1,110 138–1,430 138–1,750

Cost differences
IS vs control
Mean (€/patient) −25.5 +18.3 +62.1
95% CI (−73.8–22.8) (−57.4–93.9) (−41.7–165.9)
p 0.299 0.635 0.240

FCM vs control
Mean (€/patient) −51.1 +6.6 +64.4
95% CI (−126.8–24.6) (−109.4–122.6) (−92.9–221.7)
p 0.185 0.910 0.421

FCM vs IS
Mean (€/patient) −25.6 −11.7 +2.2
95% CI (−80.1–28.9) (−99.2–75.9) (−118.9–123.4)
p 0.356 0.793 0.971

Data calculations take into account both allogeneic blood and intravenous iron management costs (ALO-1), plus a hospital stay prolonged by 1 day (ALO-2) or 2 days (ALO-3) in patients receiving allogeneic red cell transfusion (ARCT). Cost differences: control costs – IV iron costs, expressed as mean and 95% confidence interval (CI); (+) cost savings, (−) incremental cost.