Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jan;144(1):21–30. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0010

Table 2.

Summary of Principal Outcome Analysis for D2FS increment

Xylitol Placebo Rate Ratio1 95% CI1 p-value1
Excluding UTHSCSA

n=218 n=219

follow-up (years)2,3 2.54 (.55) 2.58 (.50)
baseline D2FS score2 21.3(13.6) 21.4 (13.3)
annualized D2FS increment4 2.69 2.98 0. 90 (0.78, 1.03) 0.14

Including UTHSCSA

n=331 n=338

follow-up (years)2,3 2.55 (.49) 2.57 (.47)
baseline D2FS score2 18.8 (12.8) 18.5 (12.5)
annualized D2FS increment4,5 2.64 2.96 0.89 (0.80, 1.01) 0.063
1

based on negative binomial model adjusting for age at randomization, age-squared, dental cleaning or exam in the last 12 months, OTC fluoride use, usually brush/floss, baseline severity, site

2

data expressed as mean (SD)

3

time from baseline to last observed follow-up visit

4

includes imputed data (from baseline to first annual visit) for 22 individuals from UAB or UNC with no follow-up data

5

based on analysis excluding an additional 5 individuals with missing covariate data