Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2010 Jun 9;401(1):84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.06.004

Table 4.

Stability analysis

High–low (stability)
AA G4 design NNB G4
Positions with wild-type bias
D23 10% D 0% +3%
A24 8% A −4% +1%
P25 42% P 0% +4%
V29 A|L|S|V +10|−19|+18|+5 + 29|−11|−27|+12
Y31 S|Y 0%
G52 49% G +7% +10%
S53 51% S +5% +20%
S55 51% S +18% +44%
T56 49% T +10% +8%
G77 12% G +1% +5%
G79 12% G +17% +17%
S85 100% S +18%
Positions without wild-type bias
Y 19% −1% −4%
S 10% +5% +2%
G 6% 0% +1%
D 10% +2% +5%
R 4% −1% +2%
C 10% 1% −2%
H 6% 0% 0%

The NNB and G4 libraries were independently sorted for clones of low stability and high stability. Sequences of about 50 clones from each sorted population were analyzed. “AA” indicates the wild-type amino acid at positions with wild-type bias or amino acids of elevated frequency at positions without wild-type bias. “G4” design indicates the designed frequency of the indicated amino acid. “NNB” and “G4” indicate the difference in amino acid frequency between the high- and low-stability populations from the indicated library, respectively.