Table 1. Statistical testing of the hypotheses on the interclass relationships of Myriapoda.
p-value | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tree | Topology | -In L | AU | KH | SH | wKH | wSH | |
Fig. 3 | Our tree topology | (Symphyla, (Pauropoda, (Chilopoda, Diplopoda))) | 36539.21707 | 0.999 | 0.995 | 0.996 | 0.992 | 0.995 |
Fig. 2a | Progoneata-Dignatha hypothesis | (Chilopoda, (Symphyla, (Diplopoda, Pauropoda))) | 36578.67945 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.008 |
Fig. 2b | Trignatha-Dignatha hypothesis | ((Chilopoda, Symphyla), (Pauropoda, Diplopoda)) | 36578.67282 | 0.004 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.018 |
Fig. 2c | Progoneata-Edafopoda hypothesis | (Chilopoda, (Diplopoda, (Pauropoda, Symphyla))) | 36585.36848 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.008 |
AU, the approximately unbiased test calculated from the multiscale bootstrap; KH, the Kishino-Hasegawa test; SH, the Shimodaira-Hasegawa test; wKH, the weighted Kishino-Hasegawa test; wSH, the weighted Shimodaira-Hasegawa test.