Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epilepsy Behav. 2013 Aug 23;29(1):190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.07.018

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Barnes Maze performance 1-10 days after SE. A. P15-SE animals (n=5) performed as well as controls (n=5). There was no difference in escape latency (i), exploration latency (ii), or errors (iii) on any day B. P21-SE animals demonstrated (i) significantly increased escape latencies compared to controls (p<0.02, RM-ANOVA; n=6, controls; n=6, SE) likely due to significant immobility and (ii) delayed initiation of exploration (p<0.01) which also led to (iii) significantly fewer errors (p<0.05). C. P30-SE animals also had (i) significantly longer escape latencies (p<0.01, RM-ANOVA; n=5, controls; n=12, SE) and (ii) exploration latencies (p<0.01). (**p<0.01, ***p<0.001, Bonferroni post-hoc test)