Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2013 Jul 19;59(5):287–295. doi: 10.3109/19396368.2013.817626

Table 1.

Cell recovery and yield of RNA from PS and SCLB purification methods.

Samples PureSperm (PS)
Somatic Cell Lysis Buffer (SCLB)
Input cells Recovered cells Recovery rate RNA (ng) / 106 cells Input cells Recovered cells Recovery rate RNA (ng) / 106 cells
S1P
166.5 78 46.8% 37 166.5 132 79.3% 14
S2P
145 96 66.2% 47 145 108 74.5% 12
S3P
132.5 78 58.9% 86 132.5 120 90.7% 14
S4P
155 66 42.6% 23 155 132 85.2% 19
S1L
150 98 65.3% 29 150 120 80.0% 20
S2L
80 56 70.0% 26 80 94* 100.0% 38
S3L
150 84 56.0% 89 150 132 88.0% 30
S4L
70 70 100.0% 76 70 70 100.0% 15

The values in columns ‘input cells’ and ‘recovered cells’ are as million (× 106). The samples from four subjects were denoted S1, S2, S3, and S4. P: pelleted storage; L: liquefied storage; Input cells: the number of sperm cells as initial input for purification; Recovered cells: the number of recovered sperm after purification; Recovery rate: the percentage of recovery; RNA (ng) / 106 cells: the yield of isolated RNA (ng) from one million sperm cells;

*

: in one SCLB sample, the number of recovered cells is higher than the number of input cells. Probably this is related with sperm cell counting method. Its recovery rate is reset back to 100% in the table.