Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 18;8:61. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00061

Table 8.

Comparison of mean latencies in single-task vs. dual-task conditions for eye and pointing movements and for biceps activity in trials where no stop signal was presented.

Eyes Hands Biceps
Mean RT (ms): U-test Mean RT (ms): U-test Mean RT (ms): U-test
Single Dual p(2-tailed) Single Dual p(2-tailed) Single Dual p(2-tailed)
CS 294.4 > 289.6 0.001 344.5 < 345.9 n.s. 306.3 < 308.1 n.s.
DS 243.9 < 249.1 n.s. 320.3 < 326.0 <0.001 265.7 < 272.8 <0.001
EH 242.6 < 257.2 <0.001 331.0 < 331.4 n.s. 263.2 < 264.2 n.s.
IM 238.1 < 242.7 <0.001 358.9 > 357.8 n.s. 298.1 > 293.8 n.s.
IW 263.2 < 280.0 <0.001 315.5 > 314.6 n.s. 259.3 < 261.0 0.004
SW 293.7 > 289.5 n.s. 374.3 > 371.7 n.s. 323.1 > 319.7 n.s.
Mean RT (ms): T-test Mean RT (ms): T-test Mean RT (ms): T-test
Single Dual p(2-tailed) Single Dual p(2-tailed) Single Dual p(2-tailed)
GM 262.7 < 268.0 n.s. 340.8 < 341.2 n.s. 286.0 < 286.6 n.s.

Marked in bold are the values, where participants responded significantly faster in the single-task than in the dual-task condition.