Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Aug;40(8):657–662. doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000431358.18959.d4

Table 2.

Receipt of EPT among interviewed gonorrhea cases by board opinions: SSuN sites without law authorizing EPT for gonorrhea

Policy variables Bivariate Analyses
Unweighted N Weighted % (SE) P value
All 7 sites (n=1363)
State medical board opinion+ <.01
 Yes, prohibits 0 0
 Yes, permits 448 24.4% (10.1)*
 No 915 1.1% (0.4)*
Other non-medical board opinion <.01
 Yes, prohibits 115 3.8% (0.8)
 Yes, permits 448 24.4% (10.1)*
 No 800 1.0% (0.4)*
6 sites without a state-wide effort to promote EPT (n=1124)
State medical board opinion <.01
 Yes, prohibits 0 0
 Yes, permits 209 4.5% (0.5)
 No 915 1.1% (0.4)*
Other non-medical board opinion <.01
 Yes, prohibits 115 3.8% (0.8)
 Yes, permits 209 4.5% (0.5)
 No 800 1.0% (0.4)*

Board rulings defined as “prohibit” did not refer directly to EPT.

*

Estimate is unstable: relative standard error is > 30%.