Table 2.
Receipt of EPT among interviewed gonorrhea cases by board opinions: SSuN sites without law authorizing EPT for gonorrhea
| Policy variables | Bivariate Analyses
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Unweighted N | Weighted % (SE) | P value | |
| All 7 sites (n=1363) | |||
| State medical board opinion+ | <.01 | ||
| Yes, prohibits | 0 | 0 | |
| Yes, permits | 448 | 24.4% (10.1)* | |
| No | 915 | 1.1% (0.4)* | |
| Other non-medical board opinion† | <.01 | ||
| Yes, prohibits | 115 | 3.8% (0.8) | |
| Yes, permits | 448 | 24.4% (10.1)* | |
| No | 800 | 1.0% (0.4)* | |
| 6 sites without a state-wide effort to promote EPT (n=1124) | |||
| State medical board opinion† | <.01 | ||
| Yes, prohibits | 0 | 0 | |
| Yes, permits | 209 | 4.5% (0.5) | |
| No | 915 | 1.1% (0.4)* | |
| Other non-medical board opinion† | <.01 | ||
| Yes, prohibits | 115 | 3.8% (0.8) | |
| Yes, permits | 209 | 4.5% (0.5) | |
| No | 800 | 1.0% (0.4)* | |
Board rulings defined as “prohibit” did not refer directly to EPT.
Estimate is unstable: relative standard error is > 30%.