Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Radiat Res. 2010 Oct 7;174(6):763–772. doi: 10.1667/RR2003.1

Table 1.

Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for prevalence of subclinical hyperthyroidism: effects of age at examination by gender.

Gender
Age at examination
Case (76) Noncase (11,777) Rate per 103 ORa 95% CI Test for
heterogeneityb trendc
All: 12–14 3 1,243 2.41 0.43 0.10,1.28 0.07 0.05
15–19 18 3,493 5.13 1
20–24 30 3,612 8.24 1.61 0.89,2.99
25–32 25 3,429 7.24 1.37 0.73,2.63

Male: 12–14 1 624 1.60 0.39 0.02,2.20 0.73 0.80
15–19 8 1,758 4.53 1
20–24 6 1,879 3.18 0.67 0.22,1.96
25–32 8 1,802 4.42 0.90 0.32,2.51

Total 23 6,063 3.78

Female: 12–14 2 619 3.22 0.48 0.07,1.84 0.02 0.03
15–19 10 1,735 5.73 1
20–24 24 1,733 13.66 2.42 1.17,5.39
25–32 17 1,627 10.34 1.76 0.79,4.13

Total 53 5,714 9.19

Test for interactiond 0.33
a

All analyses performed with adjustment for gender, place of residency, period of examination, ATPO level, thyroid volume, ultrasound-detected nodules and I-131 dose with the 3-category non-parametric response.

b

Based on the LRT for categorical age effects vs no age effect (df=3).

c

Based on the LRT for logit-linear age effects vs no age effect (df=1).

d

Based on the LRT for the interaction between gender and categorical age effects (df=3).