Skip to main content
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders logoLink to Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders
. 2014 Jan 6;13:3. doi: 10.1186/2251-6581-13-3

Cross-country differences in the association between diabetes and disability

Shervin Assari 1,2,, Reza Moghani Lankarani 3, Maryam Moghani Lankarani 4,5
PMCID: PMC3927767  PMID: 24393171

Abstract

Purpose

This study tested possible cross-country differences in the associations between diabetes and activities of daily living (ADLs), and possible confounding / mediating effects of socio-economic status, obesity, and exercise.

Methods

Data came from Research on Early Life and Aging Trends and Effects (RELATE). The study included a total number of 25,372 community sample of adults who were 40 years or older. We used data from community based surveys in seven countries including China, Mexico, Barbados, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, and Uruguay. Demographics (age and gender), socio-economic status (education and income), obesity, exercise, and ADL (bath, dress, toilet, transfer, heavy, shopping, meals) were measured. Self-reported data on physician diagnosis of diabetes was the independent variable. We tested if diabetes is associated with ADL, before and after adjusting for socio-economics, obesity, and exercise in each country.

Results

Based on Model I (age and gender adjusted model), diabetes was associated with limitation in at least one ADL in Mexico, Barbados, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, and Uruguay, but not China. Based on Model II that also controlled for education and income, education explained the association between diabetes and limitation in ADL in Mexico and Uruguay. Based on Model III that also controlled for exercise and obesity, in Cuba and Brazil, exercise explained the link between diabetes and limitation in performing ADLs. Thus, the link between diabetes and ADL was independent of our covariates only in Chile and Barbados.

Conclusions

There are cross-country differences in the link between diabetes and limitation in ADL. There are also cross-country differences in how socio-economic status, obesity, and exercise explain the above association.

Keywords: Diabetes, Socio-economics, Disability, Exercise, Obesity, Cross country study

Introduction

About three hundred fifty million people have diabetes worldwide [1]. With a direct medical cost of 465 billion U.S. dollars in the year 2011, diabetes is responsible for more than 10% of total healthcare expenditures in adults [2].

People with diabetes are more likely to experience limitations in activities of daily living (ADL), mobility, and role functioning [3-5]. Given the growing rate of diabetes and its associated disability burden in the world [2], for different reasons, more research is still needed on the link between diabetes and ADLs [6].

First, research on disability among people with diabetes may suggest avenues for reducing the disability attributable to this common chronic disease [3]. Second, although diabetes has been consistently related to a broad spectrum of health outcomes, including quality of life, ADL and mobility disability [7], and lower extremity function [8], it is not clear if the association between diabetes and ADL remains significant after controlling for other factors, and also it is not clear if the same link exits in different countries [9]. Third, a large proportion of a major part of evidence on the link between diabetes and burden of mobility-related disability has originated from studies conducted on patients, or disabled individuals [9]. However, clinical samples and community individuals vary on many factors and there is a need to show the ADLs among individuals with diabetes in a community sample. Finally, more research is needed on cross-country differences in associations between diabetes and disabilities.

Although literature has frequently shown that diabetes has a role in the disablement of people, further research is needed to extend the current limited knowledge about this association [9]. The current study tested cross-country differences in association between diabetes and ADLs.

Methods

Data came from Research on Early Life and Aging Trends and Effects (RELATE), that included seven different studies [10]. This analysis included 25,372 individuals who were age 40 or older. These individuals were sampled in the following seven countries: China, Mexico, Barbados, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, and Uruguay. All surveys were fully in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration on ethical principles for medical research involving humans. Different institutional review boards approved participating surveys.

The following countries were participating in RELATE project and represented countries from a diverse range in national income levels: Barbados represents high income countries; Cuba, Uruguay, Chile, Brazil, and Mexico represent upper middle income countries; and China represents lower middle income countries [11].

Although most country-specific surveys had sampling weights, as recommended, the current study did not apply sampling weights. The main reason was that sampling weights were not applicable to data from China (China Health and Nutrition Study; CHNS).

Measures

Demographic characteristics

The study measured age (continuous variable) and gender (dichotomous variable of male and female) as two demographic variables.

Socio-economic status

The study measured education (four level categorical variable of 1) no schooling, 2) primary to elementary, 3) secondary to intermediate, and 4) higher), and income(continuous variable) as socio-economic status.

Obesity and exercise

The study measured obesity and exercise based on self reported data. BMI larger than 30 was considered as obesity.

Main outcome

Seven activities of daily living (ADLs) were measured by a modified Barthel index [12-15]. ADL items that were included in this study included bath, dress, toilet, transfer, heavy, shopping, and meals. These items have been frequently used to assess ADLs in the community sample [16,17].

Data analysis

Data analysis was conducted using SPSS for Windows. We used country specific logistic regressions to determine if diabetes is associated with ADLs, and if this link is independent of socio-economic factors (education, and income), obesity and exercise. In all models, at least one ADL limitation was our outcome. In Model I, we only adjusted for age and gender. In Model II, we also adjusted for education and income. In Model III, we also adjusted for obesity and exercise.

Results

Table 1 shows country differences by means of mean age, education, income, and ADLs. Mean age was lowest in China, and highest in Brazil. ADL limitation was highest in Chile, and lowest in Uruguay. Education was lowest in Brazil, and highest in Cuba. Income was highest in Uruguay and lowest in Cuba.

Table 1.

Age, income, education, and activities of daily living in different countries among 25,372 community sample of adults

  Min Max Mean SD
China
 
 
 
 
Age
40
100
60.60
10.30
Income
0
500000
8645.24
15404.23
Education
1
4
2.18
0.85
Activities of daily living
0
7
0.63
1.35
Mexico
 
 
 
 
Age
40
97
68.81
8.41
Income
0
714285
11716.48
29825.89
Education
1
4
2.02
0.75
Activities of daily living
0
7
0.71
1.23
Barbados
 
 
 
 
Age
60
97
72.17
8.13
Income
0
804800
9321.03
37361.75
Education
1
4
2.22
0.56
Activities of daily living
0
7
0.32
0.84
Brazil
 
 
 
 
Age
60
100
72.94
8.26
Income
0
99900
3705.36
7495.84
Education
1
4
1.83
0.68
Activities of daily living
0
7
0.84
1.36
Chile
 
 
 
 
Age
60
99
71.44
8.00
Income
0
989232
279282.30
266840.20
Education
1
4
2.19
0.81
Activities of daily living
0
7
0.92
1.49
Cuba
 
 
 
 
Age
60
102
71.63
8.66
Income
0
109992
1456.25
5071.77
Education
1
4
2.46
0.70
Activities of daily living
0
7
0.69
1.28
Uruguay
 
 
 
 
Age
60
97
70.67
7.28
Income
0
960000
39607.53
71022.13
Education
1
4
2.37
0.78
Activities of daily living 0 7 0.46 0.95

Model I

Based on the first model, with an exception of China, diabetes was associated with ADL, and this link was independent of age and gender. Gender and age were associated with ADL in all countries (Table 2).

Table 2.

Results of models I, with age and gender as covariates among 25,372 community sample of adults

 
 
 
 
 
 
95% C.I. for EXP(B)
  B S.E. Wald Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
China
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.046
.057
0.636
.425
1.047
0.936
1.171
Age
.119
.002
4322.269
< .001
1.126
1.122
1.13
Female gender
.823
.038
474.844
< .001
2.277
2.115
2.452
Mexico
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.294
.149
3.866
.049
1.342
1.001
1.798
Age
.073
.008
78.043
< .001
1.075
1.058
1.093
Female gender
1.087
.134
66.085
< .001
2.966
2.282
3.855
Barbados
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.575
.151
14.59
< .001
1.778
1.323
2.389
Age
.064
.008
65.319
< .001
1.066
1.05
1.083
Female gender
.625
.143
19.177
< .001
1.869
1.413
2.472
Brazil
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.298
.121
6.036
.014
1.347
1.062
1.708
Age
.075
.006
164.576
< .001
1.078
1.066
1.09
Female gender
.973
.098
98.472
< .001
2.646
2.183
3.207
Chile
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.372
.176
4.494
.034
1.451
1.029
2.048
Age
.065
.008
69.835
< .001
1.067
1.051
1.083
Female gender
1.095
.134
66.678
< .001
2.99
2.299
3.89
Cuba
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.378
.138
7.532
.006
1.459
1.114
1.91
Age
.062
.006
112.843
< .001
1.064
1.052
1.076
Female gender
1.009
.112
80.636
< .001
2.742
2.2
3.417
Uruguay
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.323
.172
3.532
.060
1.382
0.986
1.936
Age
.06
.008
54.291
< .001
1.062
1.045
1.079
Female gender .785 .133 34.711 < .001 2.193 1.689 2.847

Model II

Based on Model II that also controlled for education and income, education explained the association between diabetes and limitation in ADL in Mexico and Uruguay. Based on this model, gender and age were associated with ADL in all countries. However, education was not correlated with ADL in Barbados, Cuba, and Uruguay. Income was linked to ADL in China and Brazil (Table 3).

Table 3.

Results of models II, with age, gender and socio-economic status as covariates among 25,372 community sample of adults

 
 
 
 
 
 
95% C.I. for EXP(B)
  B S.E. Wald Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
China
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.062
.059
1.081
.299
1.063
.947
1.194
Age
.118
.002
4050.944
.000
1.125
1.121
1.129
Female gender
.730
.042
305.224
< .001
2.075
1.912
2.252
Education
-.169
.026
41.884
< .001
.844
.802
.889
Income
.000
.000
4.355
.037
1.000
1.000
1.000
Mexico
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.236
.151
2.438
.118
1.266
.942
1.701
Age
.070
.008
71.441
< .001
1.073
1.056
1.091
Female gender
1.045
.135
60.226
< .001
2.843
2.184
3.701
Education
-.250
.078
10.385
.001
.779
.669
.907
Income
.000
.000
.269
.604
1.000
1.000
1.000
Barbados
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.666
.163
16.737
< .001
1.947
1.415
2.680
Age
.064
.009
52.773
< .001
1.066
1.047
1.084
Female gender
.588
.159
13.715
< .001
1.800
1.319
2.457
Education
-.137
.122
1.259
.262
.872
.687
1.107
Income
.000
.000
1.540
.215
1.000
1.000
1.000
Brazil
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.290
.123
5.562
.018
1.336
1.050
1.701
Age
.070
.006
135.643
< .001
1.072
1.060
1.085
Female gender
.923
.099
86.452
< .001
2.516
2.071
3.056
Education
-.237
.069
11.764
< .001
.789
.689
.903
Income
.000
.000
18.748
< .001
1.000
1.000
1.000
Chile
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.392
.180
4.750
.029
1.480
1.040
2.105
Age
.065
.008
67.121
< .001
1.067
1.051
1.084
Female gender
1.070
.137
60.798
< .001
2.917
2.229
3.817
Education
-.248
.062
16.089
< .001
.781
.692
.881
Income
.000
.000
1.143
.285
1.000
1.000
1.000
Cuba
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.381
.138
7.578
.006
1.463
1.116
1.919
Age
.058
.006
93.065
< .001
1.059
1.047
1.072
Female gender
.980
.113
75.287
< .001
2.666
2.136
3.327
Education
-.222
.073
9.251
.002
.801
.694
.924
Income
.000
.000
3.320
.068
1.000
1.000
1.000
Uruguay
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.227
.183
1.541
.214
1.255
.877
1.798
Age
.052
.009
36.573
< .001
1.054
1.036
1.072
Female gender
.820
.142
33.140
< .001
2.270
1.717
3.000
Education
-.238
.074
10.441
.001
.788
.682
.911
Income .000 .000 .178 .673 1.000 1.000 1.000

Model III

Based on Model III that also controlled for obesity and exercise, in Cuba and Brazil, exercise explained the link between diabetes and limitation in performing ADLs. Based on this model, the link between diabetes and ADL was independent of our covariates only in Chile and Barbados. Based on this model, gender and age were associated with ADL in all countries. Obesity was linked to ADL only in Barbados. Exercise was linked to ADL in all countries (Table 4).

Table 4.

Results of models III, with age, gender, socio-economic status, exercise and obesity as covariates among 25,372 community sample of adults

 
 
 
 
 
 
95% C.I. for EXP(B)
  B S.E. Wald Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
China
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.036
.316
.013
.909
1.037
.558
1.926
Age
.103
.009
134.296
< .001
1.108
1.089
1.128
Female gender
.836
.136
37.870
< .001
2.307
1.768
3.011
Education
-.128
.054
5.520
.019
.880
.791
.979
Income
.000
.000
3.445
.063
1.000
1.000
1.000
Exercise
-.711
.160
19.680
< .001
.491
.359
.673
Obesity
-.390
.326
1.427
.232
.677
.357
1.284
Mexico
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.185
.166
1.236
.266
1.203
.868
1.668
Age
.062
.009
42.516
< .001
1.064
1.044
1.084
Female gender
1.042
.153
46.221
< .001
2.836
2.100
3.830
Education
-.238
.089
7.106
.008
.788
.661
.939
Income
.000
.000
.003
.953
1.000
1.000
1.000
Exercise
-.569
.160
12.663
< .001
.566
.413
.774
Obesity
.079
.154
.260
.610
1.082
.800
1.463
Barbados
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.438
.178
6.072
.014
1.550
1.094
2.196
Age
.053
.010
27.477
< .001
1.054
1.034
1.075
Female gender
.478
.176
7.411
.006
1.613
1.143
2.275
Education
-.038
.131
.084
.772
.963
.744
1.245
Income
.000
.000
2.459
.117
1.000
1.000
1.000
Exercise
-.602
.176
11.730
.001
.548
.388
.773
Obesity
.513
.185
7.716
.005
1.671
1.163
2.400
Brazil
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.125
.137
.831
.362
1.133
.866
1.484
Age
.061
.007
78.208
< .001
1.063
1.048
1.077
Female gender
.974
.114
72.657
< .001
2.649
2.117
3.314
Education
-.210
.081
6.757
.009
.811
.692
.950
Income
.000
.000
9.882
.002
1.000
1.000
1.000
Exercise
-1.075
.143
56.711
< .001
.341
.258
.451
Obesity
.198
.132
2.235
.135
1.219
.940
1.580
Chile
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.413
.188
4.848
.028
1.512
1.046
2.183
Age
.061
.008
52.554
< .001
1.063
1.045
1.080
Female gender
1.068
.145
54.130
< .001
2.911
2.190
3.870
Education
-.213
.064
11.033
.001
.808
.713
.916
Income
.000
.000
.587
.443
1.000
1.000
1.000
Exercise
-.764
.168
20.648
< .001
.466
.335
.648
Obesity
.012
.141
.007
.933
1.012
.767
1.335
Cuba
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.278
.149
3.472
.062
1.320
.986
1.768
Age
.047
.007
50.995
< .001
1.048
1.035
1.061
Female gender
.956
.124
59.358
< .001
2.601
2.040
3.318
Education
-.132
.080
2.736
.098
.876
.749
1.025
Income
.000
.000
1.888
.169
1.000
1.000
1.000
Exercise
-.729
.149
23.980
< .001
.483
.361
.646
Obesity
.263
.154
2.907
.088
1.301
.961
1.760
Uruguay
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diabetes
.155
.197
.623
.430
1.168
.794
1.718
Age
.047
.009
25.884
< .001
1.049
1.030
1.068
Female gender
.724
.156
21.482
< .001
2.062
1.518
2.801
Education
-.196
.081
5.878
.015
.822
.701
.963
Income
.000
.000
.382
.536
1.000
1.000
1.000
Exercise
-1.413
.282
25.015
< .001
.244
.140
.424
Obesity .112 .145 .594 .441 1.118 .842 1.485

Discussion

Our study showed at least four important cross-country differences in the pattern of association between diabetes and disability; 1) in most (i.e. Mexico, Barbados, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, and Uruguay) but not all countries (China), diabetes seems to be associated with ADL, 2) in some countries (i.e. Mexico and Uruguay), education explains the association between diabetes and ADL limitation, 3) in some countries (i.e. Cuba and Brazil), exercise explains the link between diabetes and ADLs, and 4) in some countries (i.e. Chile and Barbados), the link between diabetes and ADL seems to be independent of our covariates/mediators.

Only in Chile and Barbados was the link between diabetes and ADL independent of all study covariates/mediators. Based on a study in Japan, history of diabetes, bone fractures, and heart diseases contributed to some specific aspects of ADL disabilities, however, cerebrovascular disease influenced all aspects of ADL [18].

We showed that in Cuba and Brazil, physical activity might be a mechanism behind the link between diabetes and ADL. According to the literature, at least a part of the limitations in ADLs of patients with diabetes might be due to function in extremities. A study examined how hand disorders contribute to ADLs among elderly men with diabetes, and showed that limited joint motion (measured by prayer sign and Dupuytren's contracture) was more common in individuals with diabetes, compared to non-diabetics. Vibrotactile sense was impaired symmetrically in the index and little fingers in diabetics [19].

Peripheral artery disease and peripheral nerve dysfunction are known causes of diabetes -related disability [9,20], and may explain more than 30% of the association of diabetes with disability related dysfunction in physical activity. Physical activity is particularly important for people with diabetes, because being physically active can improve the body's ability to use insulin and facilitate weight loss [21-25]. In the United States, for example, only one-third of individuals with diabetes and obesity are physically active [26,27]. Interventions need to enhance physical activity of patients, and this may break the cycle by which diabetes causes limitation in performing ADLs.

The current study failed to show mediating or confounding effects of obesity on the association between diabetes and ADLs. However, obesity had an independent association with ADLs in one of the seven countries (Barbados). Literature suggests that obesity and overweight may mediate or confound the link between diabetes and disability. In a survey among obese diabetic individuals, ADL was linked to current exercise, using exercise programs, and self-reported weight history [28]. In a qualitative study among obese (body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m2) individuals with diabetes, patients believed that their performance of daily activities would improve with weight loss of 5–10% of body weight [29].

The ability to remain physically active is an essential aspect of quality of life and is critical for the preservation of independence among patients with diabetes. Lower extremity function is a strong predictor of poor health outcomes, including disability, hospitalization, and death among patients [30,31]. Recently, a search for potentially modifiable conditions associated with impaired mobility and lower extremity function identified several socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics, along with acute and chronic medical conditions [32,33]. Among the latter group, diabetes has been shown to be consistently a correlate of poor extremity performance [34,35].

Several impairments and comorbidities are involved in the disablement process associated with diabetes. Obesity, visual impairment, and cardiovascular diseases may mediate the association between diabetes and disability among diabetic patients. These conditions are important causes of different aspects of physical dysfunction in older individuals [36,37].

The association between diabetes and ADLs did not stay significant in the multivariable models in most countries. The literature is also not informative about the question of whether or not the link between diabetes and disability is independent of other factors that contribute to disability. We know that several conditions that may contribute to the impairment in ADLs are more prevalent in diabetic patients than controls. These conditions may be the actual mechanisms by which diabetes is associated with physical disability. Some of these conditions include cardiovascular diseases, peripheral neuropathy, obesity, and visual deficits [35].

Our findings are important for different reasons. As very few studies have shown exact mechanisms by which disability is seen among patients with diabetes [35], our knowledge about the mechanisms underlying the disability among diabetic patients is limited. Further research is needed to know which complication of the disease plays a more important role in the disablement process. Further research is also needed on possible synergistic effects of different conditions associated with diabetes [38]. In addition, prevalence of diabetes is expected to increase considerably in the next decades [38]. And knowledge from similar studies may be important for planning strategies aimed at preventing or slowing functional decline in older persons and for tertiary prevention in subjects with diabetes [9].

Our study has strengths and limitations. This was a cross-national survey composed of different surveys conducted in seven countries [10]. Research on Early Life and Aging Trends and Effects (RELATE) did not collect data on duration of diabetes, or mental health of the participants. Duration of diabetes is known to be strongly linked to disability among patients with diabetes. We also did not collect data on degree of metabolic imbalance, as we know loss of control of glucose may be a mediator for the disabling effect of diabetes [9]. Based on the literature, high prevalence of depression among diabetic patients may explain a substantial proportion of the excess risk of disability associated with diabetes. Depression is common among patients with diabetes [39-41]. Longitudinal studies are warranted to elucidate the role of depression in the pathway from diabetes to disability. Our study is one of very few studies that contribute to our understandings of cross – country differences in morbidity related to diabetes. To study cross – country differences in mental health associates of diabetes, one study used data from World Mental Health, and showed that with a consistent pattern, in all countries, mood and anxiety disorders occurred with somewhat greater frequency among persons with diabetes than those without diabetes, and the strength of association did not differ significantly across countries [42]. It is essential to conduct more research to test if the association between diabetes and disability is independent of other chronic conditions or not [9].

Our study sheds light on cross – country differences in factors associated with well-being. Considerable differences in morbidity, life satisfaction, and well-being have been shown across the globe [43,44]. The World Values Survey, European Values Study, Eurobarometer, and Latinobarometer, have consistently shown that life expectancy, physical health, all-cause mortality, and also subjective well-being vary across countries [45-48].

Conclusion

To conclude, our study showed considerable differences in the association between diabetes and disability across countries. The study also suggests that there might be some cross-country differences in the factors that may explain this link.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SA designed the study and conducted data analysis, MML and RML conducted the literature review and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Shervin Assari, Email: assari@umich.edu.

Reza Moghani Lankarani, Email: dr.reza@gmail.com.

Maryam Moghani Lankarani, Email: lankaranii@yahoo.com.

Acknowledgement

Research on Early Life and Aging Trends and Effects (RELATE) was funded by United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, and National Institute on Aging (K25AG027239). This fund was used to create the RELATE dataset from existing data sources. The following individuals and Principal Investigators also deserve recognition for being instrumental in the release of the first public version of RELATE: Drs. George Alter, Barry Popkin, David Weir, Yi Zeng, Luis Rosero-Bixby, Ana Luisa Dávila, Alberto Palloni, Somnath Chatterji, Paul Kowal, Pamela Herd, and Bob Hauser. A full detail of funding sources for each of the country specific studies are available in the appendices for the RELATE data [10].

References

  1. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ. et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet. 2011;378:31–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. International Diabetes Foundation. Global Burden. http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/5e/the-global-burden.
  3. Ryerson B, Tierney EF, Thompson TJ, Engelgau MM, Wang J, Gregg EW, Geiss LS. Excess physical limitations among adults with diabetes in the US population, 1997–1999. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:206–10. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.1.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gregg EW, Beckles GL, Williamson DF, Leveille SG, Langlois JA, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Diabetes and physical disability among older US adults. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1272–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Volpato S, Blaum C, Resnick H, Ferrucci L, Fried LP, Guralnick JM. Women’s Health and Aging Study. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:678–83. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.4.678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Von Korff M, Katon W, Lin EH, Simon G, Ludman E, Oliver M, Ciechanowski P, Rutter C, Bush T. Potentially modifiable factors associated with disability among people with diabetes. Psychosom Med. 2005;67(2):233–40. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000155662.82621.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdel-Marchasson I, Dubroca B, Manciet G, Decamps A, Emeriau JP, Dartigues JF. Prevalence of diabetes and effect on quality of life in older French living in the community: the PAQUID Epidemiological Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:295–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb00943.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferrucci L, Penninx BW, Leveille SG, Corti MC, Pahor M, Wallace R, Harris TB, Havlik RJ, Guralnik JM. Characteristics of nondisabled older persons who perform poorly in objective tests of lower extremity function. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1102–1110. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04787.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Volpato S, Blaum C, Resnick H, Ferrucci L, Fried LP, Guralnik JM. Women’s Health and Aging Study. Comorbidities and impairments explaining the association between diabetes and lower extremity disability: the Women's Health and Aging Study. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(4):678–83. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.4.678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McEniry M. Research on Early Life and Aging Trends and Effects (RELATE): A Cross-National Study. ICPSR34241-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]; 2013. pp. 06–12. 10.3886/ICPSR34241.v1 Persistent URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34241.v1. [Google Scholar]
  11. The World Bank. How we Classify Countries. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications.
  12. Mahoney FI, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:56–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke. 1990;21:78–81. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.21.1.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gresham GE, Phillips TF, Labi ML. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61:355–358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disability Study. 1988;10:61–63. doi: 10.3109/09638288809164103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dudgeon BJ, Hoffman JM, Ciol MA, Shumway-Cook A, Yorkston KM, Chan L. Managing activity difficulties at home: a survey of Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(7):1256–61. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.038. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.038. Epub 2008 Jun 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ostchega Y, Harris TB, Hirsch R, Parsons VL, Kington R. The prevalence of functional limitations and disability in older persons in the US: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(9):1132–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kishimoto M, Ojima T, Nakamura Y, Yanagawa H, Fujita Y, Kasagi F, Kodama K, Ueda K, Suzuki S, Kagamimori S. Relationship between the level of activities of daily living and chronic medical conditions among the elderly. J Epidemiol. 1998;8(5):272–7. doi: 10.2188/jea.8.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cederlund RI, Thomsen N, Thrainsdottir S, Eriksson KF, Sundkvist G, Dahlin LB. Hand disorders, hand function, and activities of daily living in elderly men with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2009;23(1):32–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dermott MM, Fried L, Simonsick E, Ling S, Guralnik JM. Asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease is independently associated with impaired lower extremity functioning: the Women’s Health and Aging Study. Circulation. 2000;101:1007–1012. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.9.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Fernhall B, Regensteiner JG, Blissmer BJ, Rubin RR, Chasan-Taber L, Albright AL, Braun B. American College of Sports Medicine; American Diabetes Association: exercise and type 2 diabetes: the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:e147–e167. doi: 10.2337/dc10-9990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. De Feo P, Di Loreto C, Ranchelli A, Fatone C, Gambelunghe G, Lucidi P, Santeusanio F. Exercise and diabetes. Acta Biomed. 2006;77(Suppl 1):14–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kirk A, De Feo P. Strategies to enhance compliance to physical activity for patients with insulin resistance. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32:549–556. doi: 10.1139/H07-023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Balducci S, Zanuso S, Nicolucci A, De Feo P, Cavallo S, Cardelli P, Fallucca S, Alessi E, Fallucca F, Pugliese G. Italian Diabetes Exercise Study (IDES) Investigators: effect of an intensive exercise intervention strategy on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1794–1803. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. What I Need to Know About Physical Activity and Diabetes. 2008. http://www.diabetes.niddk.nih.gov (accessed February 2011)
  26. Nelson KM, Reiber G, Boyko EJ. Diet and exercise among adults with type 2 diabetes: findings from the Third National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES III) Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1722–1728. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Moratto EH, Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Ghushchyan V, Sullivan PW. Physical activity in U.S. adults with diabetes and at risk for developing diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:203–209. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hayes RP, Nelson DR, Meldahl ML, Curtis BH. Ability to perform daily physical activities in individuals with type 2 diabetes and moderate obesity: a preliminary validation of the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(7):705–12. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Curtis B, Hayes R, Fehnel S, Zografos L. Assessing the effect of weight and weight loss in obese persons with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2008;1:13–23. doi: 10.2147/dmso.s4237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:556–561. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199503023320902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Penninx BW, Ferrucci L, Leveille SG, Rantanen T, Pahor M, Guralnik JM. Lower extremity performance in nondisabled older persons as a predictor of subsequent hospitalization. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55:M691–M697. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.11.M691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ensrud KE, Nevitt MC, Yunis C, Cauley JA, Seeley DG, Fox KM, Cummings SR. Correlates of impaired function in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:481–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb04968.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Pahor M, Corti MC, Havlik RJ. Hospital diagnoses, Medicare charges, and nursing home admissions in the year when older persons become severely disabled. JAMA. 1997;277:728–734. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540330050034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Perkowski LC, Stroup-Benham CA, Markides KS, Lichtenstein MJ, Angel RJ, Guralnik JM, Goodwin JS. Lower-extremity functioning in older Mexican Americans and its association with medical problems. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:411–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02459.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Menz HB, Lord SR, St George R, Fitzpatrick RC. Walking stability and sensorimotor function in older people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(2):245–52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.015. Feb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Anthony JM, Zhang Y, Wilson PW, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kreger BE, Kannel WB. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:351–358. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.84.3.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Kasper JD, Guralnik JM. Association of comorbidity with disability in older women: the Women’s Health and Aging Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:27–37. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00124-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Nelson DE, Engelgau MM, Vinicor F, Marks JS. Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990–1998. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1278–1283. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lustman PJ, Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, de Groot M, Carney RM, Clouse RE. Depression and poor glycemic control: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:934–942. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Talbot F, Nouwen A. A review of the relationship between depression and diabetes in adults. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1556–1562. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.10.1556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Penninx BW, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Deeg DJ, Wallace RB. Depressive symptoms and physical decline in community-dwelling older persons. JAMA. 1998;279:1720–1726. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.21.1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lin EH, Korff MV, Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Anthony J, Bromet E, Bruffaerts R, Gasquet I, de Girolamo G, Gureje O, Haro JM, Karam E, Lara C, Lee S, Levinson D, Ormel JH, Posada-Villa J, Scott K, Watanabe M, Williams D. Mental disorders among persons with diabetes–results from the World Mental Health Surveys. J Psychosom Res. 2008;65(6):571–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fabrega JJ. The study of disease in relation to culture. Behav Sci. 1972;17:183–203. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830170202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gureje O, Ustun TB, Simon GE. The syndrome of hypochondriasis: a cross-national study in primary care. Psychol Med. 1997;27:1001–10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291797005345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Easterlin RA, McVey LA, Switek M, Sawangfa O, Zweig JS. The happiness-income paradox revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(52):22463–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015962107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jen MH, Sund ER, Johnston R, Jones K. Trustful societies, trustful individuals, and health: an analysis of self-rated health and social trust using the World Value Survey. Health Place. 2010;16(5):1022–9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Jen MH, Jones K, Johnston R. Global variations in health: evaluating Wilkinson's income inequality hypothesis using the World Values Survey. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(4):643–53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kim D, Kawachi I, Hoorn SV, Ezzati M. Is inequality at the heart of it? Cross-country associations of income inequality with cardiovascular diseases and risk factors. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(8):1719–32. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES