Table 4.
Covariate | Kenya (in 2008–2009)b |
Malawi (in 2010) |
Rwanda (in 2010) |
Tanzania (in 2010) |
Uganda (in 2006) |
Zambia (in 2007) |
Zimbabwe (in 2010–2011) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
Marital status | ||||||||||||||
Never married | 0.80 | 0.31, 2.11 | 0.49 | 0.11, 2.06 | 1.35 | 0.50, 3.66 | 0.63 | 0.33, 1.20 | 0.05c | 0.01, 0.41 | 0.27c | 0.12, 0.63 | 1.17 | 0.55, 2.50 |
Formerly married | 3.54c | 1.36, 9.21 | 2.13d | 1.41, 3.20 | 2.59c | 1.34, 5.01 | 1.98d | 1.42, 2.76 | 2.06e | 1.19, 3.58 | 1.93e | 1.05, 3.55 | 1.99c | 1.25, 3.18 |
Age, years | 1.05d | 1.03, 1.08 | 1.02 | 1.00, 1.05 | 1.01 | 0.97, 1.06 | 1.04d | 1.02, 1.05 | 1.01 | 0.98, 1.04 | 1.01 | 0.99, 1.04 | 1.03e | 1.01, 1.06 |
Education | ||||||||||||||
No education | 0.62 | 0.30, 1.30 | 0.95 | 0.54, 1.68 | 0.86 | 0.40, 1.85 | 0.98 | 0.72, 1.34 | 0.55 | 0.29, 1.04 | 1.00 | 0.51, 1.94 | 0.51 | 0.19, 1.34 |
Some secondary or higher education | 0.89 | 0.54, 1.44 | 0.74 | 0.31, 1.77 | 1.03 | 0.11, 9.73 | 0.11e | 0.01, 0.92 | 0.36 | 0.08, 1.71 | 0.90 | 0.44, 1.84 | 1.62 | 0.61, 4.33 |
Bottom 40% of wealth | 0.79 | 0.35, 1.76 | 0.90 | 0.61, 1.34 | 0.77 | 0.39, 1.54 | 1.47e | 1.07, 2.00 | 0.99 | 0.55, 1.76 | 0.61 | 0.33, 1.11 | 1.84 | 1.00, 3.39 |
Urban | 2.25 | 0.97, 5.22 | 1.52 | 0.86, 2.70 | 1.83 | 0.70, 4.78 | 0.87 | 0.59, 1.29 | 1.50 | 0.62, 3.63 | 1.59 | 0.86, 2.95 | 2.71e | 1.24, 5.93 |
Distance to health facilities a big problem | 0.98 | 0.64, 1.52 | 0.85 | 0.44, 1.65 | 0.90 | 0.64, 1.25 | 0.95 | 0.60, 1.50 | 0.89 | 0.53, 1.48 | 1.54e | 1.04, 2.27 | ||
F-statistic, district/regional indicators | 1.84 | 0.67 | 2.85 | 3.55 | 1.28 | 5.76 | 2.42 | |||||||
No. of observations | 2,869 | 2,527 | 2,361 | 2,890 | 1,475 | 2,745 | 2,816 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
a Reference categories are as follows: for marital status, currently married; for education, some or complete primary; for wealth, top 60%; and for distance to health facility, not a problem. All models control for district or regional indicators.
b Distance to health care facility was excluded from questionnaire.
c P < 0.01.
d P < 0.001.
e P < 0.05.