Table 5.
Covariate | Cameroon (in 2004) |
Ghana (in 2008) |
Mali (in 2006) |
Nigeria (in 2008) |
Sao Tome and Principe (in 2008–2009) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
Marital status | ||||||||||
Never married | 0.40b | 0.17, 0.97 | 1.63 | 0.55, 4.80 | 1.43 | 0.74, 2.76 | ||||
Formerly married | 1.13 | 0.63, 2.02 | 1.80 | 0.65, 4.97 | 3.57c | 0.48, 26.44 | 2.19b | 1.10, 4.37 | 0.71a | 0.25, 1.97 |
Age, years | 1.04d | 1.02, 1.07 | 1.02 | 0.97, 1.08 | 1.04b | 1.01, 1.07 | 1.04e | 1.01, 1.07 | 1.06b | 1.01, 1.11 |
Education | ||||||||||
No education | 0.28b,f | 0.09, 0.85 | 0.33 | 0.08, 1.32 | 1.35 | 0.69, 2.64 | 0.67 | 0.35, 1.28 | 0.36c | 0.07, 1.75 |
Some secondary or higher education | 1.10 | 0.39, 3.15 | 3.14 | 0.53, 18.78 | 1.74b | 1.07, 2.84 | ||||
Bottom 40% of wealth | 1.43 | 0.79, 2.59 | 0.92 | 0.33, 2.55 | 0.49b | 0.24, 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.45, 1.82 | 3.41b | 1.10, 10.57 |
Urban | 0.87 | 0.45, 1.69 | 0.99 | 0.42, 2.31 | 0.96 | 0.51, 1.80 | 0.93 | 0.56, 1.55 | 3.27e | 1.42, 7.53 |
Distance to health facilities a big problem | 1.06 | 0.68, 1.67 | 1.08 | 0.47, 2.45 | 0.67 | 0.34, 1.30 | 1.44 | 0.89, 2.32 | 0.55 | 0.15, 2.01 |
F-statistic, district/regional indicators | 4.09 | 1.24 | 4.17 | 0.96 | 1.77 | |||||
No. of observations | 1,759 | 1,075 | 2,699 | 6,640 | 765 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
a Reference categories are as follows: for marital status, currently married; for education, some or complete primary; for wealth, top 60%; and for distance to health facility, not a problem. All models control for district or regional indicators.
b P < 0.05.
c Because of low rates of reporting, never married women were combined with currently married women as the reference category.
d P < 0.001.
e P < 0.01.
f Because of low rates of reporting, some secondary or higher education was combined with some or complete primary education as the reference category.