Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e88473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088473

Table 4. Results of ordered probit regression models predicting U.S. adult support for embryonic stem cell research.

Predictor Covariates only Party Id Schema
Estimate SE Estimate SE Estimate SE
Year
2003 .219*** .062 .218*** .062 .196** .062
2004 .442*** .062 .437*** .062 .406*** .063
2005 .479*** .063 .469*** .063 .450*** .064
2006 .310*** .060 .306*** .060 .264*** .061
2007 .286*** .061 .285*** .061 .272*** .062
2008 .373*** .062 .359*** .062 .318*** .063
2010 .446*** .062 .440*** .062 .412*** .063
Age .006*** .001 .006*** .001 .005*** .001
Sex .052∧ .031 .033 .031 .036 .032
Education .152*** .036 .153*** .037 .078* .037
Income .045*** .012 .055*** .012 .034** .012
Race .034 .039 −.036 .040 .034 .041
Ideology −.315*** .022 −.263*** .023 −.230*** .023
Protestant −.008 .045 −.014 .045 −.036 .045
Catholic −.097* .048 −.116* .049 −.145** .049
Church attendance −.092*** .013 −.091*** .013 −.080*** .013
Religious belief −.174*** .012 −.169*** .012 −.154*** .012
Abortion beliefs −.743*** .046 −.734*** .046 −.670*** .047
Self-rated knowledge .277*** .027 .278*** .027 .227*** .028
Republican −.284*** .043 −.293*** .043
Independent −.178*** .038 −.153*** .038
Reservations −.928*** .062
Optimism .854*** .085
Threshold 1 .162 .114 −.004 .118 −.242 .120
Threshold 2 .816 .114 .653 .118 .443 .120
Threshold 3 1.975 .116 1.818 .119 1.661 .122
Nagelkerke R2 .327 .333 .387
−2* Log Likelihood 12654.3 12609.9 12139.6
Δ χ2 (DF) 1960.2 (19)*** 44.4 (2)*** 470.3 (2)***

Note:

* p<.05.

** p<.01.

*** p<.001.

Respondents were asked: “On the whole, how much do you favor or oppose medical research that uses stem cells from human embryos - do you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose this?” Responses are coded in the direction of increasing support. Source: Virginia Commonwealth University Life Sciences Surveys, 2002–2010, N = 8,105. No survey was collected in 2009.