Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e89399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089399

Table 4. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro Ipl1 phosphorylation sites in Sli15.

Observed a , b Mutated in sli15-20A and sli15-20D b Mutated in sli15-17A c Detected in vivo d Sequence contexte
137 - RFSI
177 177 RESS
233 233 233 RRSN
256 - KSSG
268 268f KESP
276 276 276 276 KKST
277 277 - KSTI
298 298 298 - KASS
305 305 305 - RLSS
317 - KISR
326 326 326 - KYSS
341 - KVSQ
382 382 382 382 RKSS
383 383 383 383 KSSI
391 - KTSL
395 - KLTT
413 - KHSS
432 432 KISV
457 457 - RPTK
460 460 460 - KASI
489f KLSP
509 509 - RLTN
533 533 RLSG
554 554 554 RMSH
564 564 564 - KQTS
578 578 578 578 KESL
589 589 589 - RDTI
a

See Table 3 for phosphorylation site mapping data.

b

This study.

c

Nakajima et al. [26]; these sites represent all occurrences of the motif [KR]-X-[ST]-[ILVST] in Sli15.

d

All verified in vivo phosphorylation sites present in the PhosphoGrid [50], [51] and Phosphopep databases [52] that have either K or R in the −2 position as required for potential Aurora B/Ipl1 phosphorylation, but without restricting the identity +1 residue.

e

Phosphorylated residue is shown in bold.

f

Possible in vivo target of a proline-directed protein kinase such as Slt2 or Cdc28 rather than Ipl1.