Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 1;3(2):118–126. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0448

Table 2.

Details of the 15 included randomized controlled trial studies

Characteristics of RCT Studies Exp (SWC+ES) Control (SWC – ES)
Ref. Study, Year of Publication N total Type of Ulcer Type of ES Weeks N Exp. PAR4 (%) N Ctr. PAR4 (%)
22 Ahmad, 2008 60 PU Uni 5 45 62.35 15 20.76
23 Baker/Rubayi, 1996 192 DFU Bi 4 125 38.49 67 51.00
24 Baker/Chambers, 1997 114 PU Bi 4 61 64.77 53 41.78
25 Barczak, 2001 33 PU Uni 4 16 69.21 17 44.04
26 Carley, 1985 30 Mixed Uni 5 15 83.46 15 37.92
27 Feedar, Kloth, 1991 50 Mixed Uni 4 26 56.18 24 32.82
28 Franek, 2006 55 VLU Uni 7 28 42.05 27 28.27
29 Franek, 2012 50 PU Uni 6 26 68.83 24 23.24
30 Houghton, 2003 42 VLU Uni 4 22 44.30 20 16.00
31 Houghton, 2010 34 PU Uni 12 16 37.02 18 13.83
32 Jankovic, 2008 43 VLU Bi 3 24 89.62 19 56.42
33 Junger, 2008 39 VLU Uni 16 20 15.11 19 3.04
34 Peters, 2001 40 DFU Uni 12 20 56.09 20 34.17
35 Petrofsky, 2010 20 DFU Bi 4 10 68.40 10 30.10
36 Wood, 1993 74 PU Uni 8 43 60.37 31 6.77
  Total/average 876 PU: 6 Uni: 11 6.53 497 57.08 379 29.34
      VLU: 4 Bi: 4          
      DFU: 3            
      Mixed: 2            

Ctr, control group; DFU, diabetic foot ulcers; Exp, experimental group; PAR4, percentage area reduction in 4 weeks; PU, pressure ulcers; VLU, venous leg ulcers.