Table 4.
Multivariate results for adherence to cancer screening recommendations
| All cancer screening (N = 78) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Correlates | OR | 95 % CI |
| Model 1 (Nagelkerke R 2 = .40; % correctly classified = 72 %) | ||
| Age | 0.91*** | 0.86–0.96 |
| English language proficiency | 0.69 | 0.18–2.66 |
| Spiritual health locus of control (passive) | 0.48* | 0.24–0.99 |
| Religious coping (positive) | 5.51* | 1.20–25.25 |
| Final model (Nagelkerke R 2 = .40; % correctly classified = 73 %) | ||
| Age | 0.92*** | 0.88–0.96 |
| Spiritual health locus of control (passive) | 0.50~ | 0.24–1.00 |
| Religious coping (positive) | 5.30* | 1.18–23.71 |
All logistic regressions were conducted using the enter method. Variables selected for inclusion in multivariate models were those that demonstrated significant bivariate associations with adherence to screening recommendations (p < .10). Results are not presented for breast, cervical cancer, or colorectal cancer screening individually due to small cell sizes
~ p < .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001