Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 13;15:57. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-57

Table 2.

Parameter values assumed for the model of the impact of the intervention for central and optimistic target scenarios, and projected impact on HIV incidence in Arms A and B compared with Arm C, assuming intervention roll-out over a 6-month time period

Parameter Central target Optimistic target
Annual coverage of test and treat campaign
70%
75%
Treatment failure & drop-out rate, per year
10%
10%
Effectiveness of ART in blocking transmission
90%
95%
Take up of male circumcision when offered
50%
50%
 
Arm A
Arm B
Arm A
Arm B
Zambia
Impact on cumulative incidence (3 years)
61%
25%
63%
27%
Impact on cumulative incidence (first 2 years)
58%
24%
61%
25%
Impact on HIV incidence during Year 1
51%
20%
54%
21%
Impact on HIV incidence during Year 2
65%
27%
67%
28%
Impact on HIV incidence during Year 3
67%
29%
68%
30%
South Africa
Impact on cumulative incidence (3 years)
62%
26%
64%
27%
  Impact on cumulative incidence (first 2 years)
59%
25%
61%
26%
Impact on HIV incidence during Year 1
52%
22%
55%
23%
Impact on HIV incidence during Year 2
65%
28%
67%
29%
Impact on HIV incidence during Year 3 68% 29% 69% 30%