Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Aug 19;143(2):575–596. doi: 10.1037/a0033715

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Individual participants’ Lag-Conditional Response Probability functions. Each panel shows the data from one participant. Participants are displayed in the same order in each of Figures 2–5. Black lines show the No-Task lists, grey lines show the Task lists. Solid lines are each participant’s actual data. Dotted lines are fits of CMR to the participant’s data. A “D” in the lower left of a participant’s panel indicates that they differed significantly from the average function, an “M” indicates that CMR failed to provide a good fit to their data (see the text for details on how these determinations were made). Subscripts on “D’s” and “M’s” indicate list type: “t” indicates Task lists, “nt” indicates No-Task lists.