Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 15;15:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-16

Table 3.

Results for true Sub. Loc.

Disulfide bonding state
Experiment
 Q
P
R
F 1
Raw predictions
 0.804 ± 0.03
 0.720 ± 0.06
 0.917 ± 0.04
 0.811 ± 0.04
Dis. + Met.
 0.832 ± 0.04
 0.767 ± 0.05
 0.913 ± 0.04
 0.833 ± 0.04
Dis. + Loc.
 0.857 ± 0.03
 0.801 ± 0.04
 0.921 ± 0.03
 0.856 ± 0.03
Dis. + Met. + Loc.
 0.867 ± 0.03
 0.819 ± 0.04
 0.919 ± 0.03
 0.865 ± 0.03
HMSVM
 0.874 ± 0.03
 0.884 ± 0.06
 0.851 ± 0.03
 0.866 ± 0.03
BRNN
 0.892 ± 0.02
 0.900 ± 0.03
 0.863 ± 0.05
 0.880 ± 0.03
Metal bonding state
Experiment
 Q
 P
 R
 F1
Raw predictions
 0.952 ± 0.02
 0.686 ± 0.09
 0.827 ± 0.10
 0.747 ± 0.09
Dis. + Met.
 0.950 ± 0.02
 0.711 ± 0.09
 0.739 ± 0.14
 0.713 ± 0.09
Dis. + Loc.
 –
 –
 –
 –
Dis. + Met. + Loc.
 0.952 ± 0.02
 0.709 ± 0.08
 0.783 ± 0.11
 0.736 ± 0.07
HMSVM
 0.950 ± 0.02
 0.74 1± 0.12
 0.697 ± 0.08
 0.711 ± 0.07
BRNN 0.948 ± 0.02 0.683 ± 0.09 0.763 ± 0.11 0.715 ± 0.07