Table 3.
Prevalence of unmeasured confounder in prevalent cohort | Prevalence of unmeasured confounder in incident cohort | HR for CVD associated with unmeasured confounder | Adjusted HR† (2.24‡) | 95% CI (2.08 to 2.40‡) |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.2 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 1.94 | 1.80 to 2.08 |
0.4 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 1.60 | 1.49 to 1.71 |
0.6 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 1.40 | 1.30 to 1.50 |
0.8 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 1.26 | 1.17 to 1.35 |
0.9 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 1.21 | 1.12 to 1.30 |
0.2 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 1.80 | 1.67 to 1.93 |
0.4 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 1.40 | 1.30 to 1.50 |
0.6 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 1.19 | 1.11 to 1.28 |
0.8 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 1.06 | 0.98 to 1.14 |
0.9 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 1.01 | 0.94 to 1.08 |
CVD = cardiovascular disease, HR = hazard ratio, CI = confidence interval
A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the association between diabetes duration and risk of CVD after adjustment for a hypothetical unmeasured confounder by varying the prevalence of the unmeasured confounder (0.2–0.9) in the prevalent diabetes cohort along with the relative hazard for CVD associated with the unmeasured confounder (HR = 2.0–3.0).
Adjusted for age, sex, smoking (ever vs never), calendar year, and histories of hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and obesity (BMI ≥ 30).
Observed HR [95% CI] of CVD for the prevalent relative to incident diabetes cohort