Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Dec 19;23(2):111–118. doi: 10.1002/pds.3557

Table 3.

Relative Hazard of Cardiovascular Disease After Adjustment for an Unmeasured Confounder in the Prevalent vs Incident Diabetes Cohort*

Prevalence of unmeasured confounder in prevalent cohort Prevalence of unmeasured confounder in incident cohort HR for CVD associated with unmeasured confounder Adjusted HR (2.24) 95% CI (2.08 to 2.40)
0.2 0.1 2.0 1.94 1.80 to 2.08
0.4 0.1 2.0 1.60 1.49 to 1.71
0.6 0.1 2.0 1.40 1.30 to 1.50
0.8 0.1 2.0 1.26 1.17 to 1.35
0.9 0.1 2.0 1.21 1.12 to 1.30
0.2 0.1 3.0 1.80 1.67 to 1.93
0.4 0.1 3.0 1.40 1.30 to 1.50
0.6 0.1 3.0 1.19 1.11 to 1.28
0.8 0.1 3.0 1.06 0.98 to 1.14
0.9 0.1 3.0 1.01 0.94 to 1.08

CVD = cardiovascular disease, HR = hazard ratio, CI = confidence interval

*

A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the association between diabetes duration and risk of CVD after adjustment for a hypothetical unmeasured confounder by varying the prevalence of the unmeasured confounder (0.2–0.9) in the prevalent diabetes cohort along with the relative hazard for CVD associated with the unmeasured confounder (HR = 2.0–3.0).

Adjusted for age, sex, smoking (ever vs never), calendar year, and histories of hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and obesity (BMI ≥ 30).

Observed HR [95% CI] of CVD for the prevalent relative to incident diabetes cohort