Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089031

Table 3. Calibration and mass spectra interpretation for diazepam, silylated temazepam and flunitrazepam standards.

Drug Regressionequation R2 value LODa/ng LOQb/ng Majorions/m/z Interpretation % abundance
Diazepam Y = 27.7× +0.27 0.978 0.571 0.643 256 [M-CO]+ or[M-(H+HCN)]+ 100
283 [M-H]+ 97
221 [M-(CO+Cl)]+ or[M-(H+HCN+Cl)]+ 33
Flunitrazepam Y = 12.02×–0.797 0.983 0.714 1.286 312 [M-H]+ 100
286 [M-HCN]+ 97
266 [M-(H+NO2)]+ or[M-(CO+F)]+ or[M-(H+HCN+F)]+ 61
Silylatedtemazepam Y = 35.7× +0.064 0.977 0.500 0.714 343 [M-(H+CO)]+ or[M-(2H+HCN)]+ 100
283 [M-(OSi(CH3)3+H)]+ 31
257 [M-NCHOSi(CH3)3]+ 36
a

Limit of detection on column, IUPAC method.

b

Limit of quantification on column, IUPAC method.