Table 3. Calibration and mass spectra interpretation for diazepam, silylated temazepam and flunitrazepam standards.
Drug | Regressionequation | R2 value | LODa/ng | LOQb/ng | Majorions/m/z | Interpretation | % abundance |
Diazepam | Y = 27.7× +0.27 | 0.978 | 0.571 | 0.643 | 256 | [M-CO]+ or[M-(H+HCN)]+ | 100 |
283 | [M-H]+ | 97 | |||||
221 | [M-(CO+Cl)]+ or[M-(H+HCN+Cl)]+ | 33 | |||||
Flunitrazepam | Y = 12.02×–0.797 | 0.983 | 0.714 | 1.286 | 312 | [M-H]+ | 100 |
286 | [M-HCN]+ | 97 | |||||
266 | [M-(H+NO2)]+ or[M-(CO+F)]+ or[M-(H+HCN+F)]+ | 61 | |||||
Silylatedtemazepam | Y = 35.7× +0.064 | 0.977 | 0.500 | 0.714 | 343 | [M-(H+CO)]+ or[M-(2H+HCN)]+ | 100 |
283 | [M-(OSi(CH3)3+H)]+ | 31 | |||||
257 | [M-NCHOSi(CH3)3]+ | 36 |
Limit of detection on column, IUPAC method.
Limit of quantification on column, IUPAC method.