Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089031

Table 4. Method validation and Kruskall-Wallis U test results from spiked beverages.

Spiked beverages a , bLOD/ng b , cLOQ/ng dRecovery % ± eSD fIs the difference significant at 95% CI?
RT storage 4°C storage
Diazepam Bacardi Breezer 0.25 0.714 89±7.9 No No
Beer 0.571 1.43 84±8.4 No No
Vodka 0.286 1 99±2.9 No No
White wine 0.071 0.156 86±5.4 No No
J2O 0.143 0.5 86±6.5 Yes No
Flunitrazepam Bacardi Breezer 0.528 1.71 77±15 No No
Beer 1.07 1.5 101±20 No Yes
Vodka 0.356 1.14 97±4.1 No Yes
White wine 0.082 0.273 56±5.3 Yes Yes
J2O 0.643 2.11 85±6.5 Yes Yes
Silylated temazepam Bacardi Breezer 0.143 0.431 84±2.5 Yes Yes
Beer 0.071 0.357 97±13 Yes No
Vodka 0.143 0.357 90±6.7 Yes Yes
White wine 0.071 0.143 81±4.1 Yes Yes
J2O 0.214 0.693 105±10 Yes Yes
a

Limit of detection,

b

IUPAC method,

c

limit of quantification,

d

n = 3,

e

standard deviation,

f

Kruskall-Wallis U test at 95% confidence interval.