Table 2.
Unadjusted odds ratios and logistic regression model for living under the poverty threshold (n = 889), Flanders, 2010
| |
|
|
Unadjusted |
Model
b
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Categories |
% or mean |
OR |
[95% CI] |
p |
OR |
[95% CI] |
p |
| Pseudo R 2 = 0.333 | ||||||||
|
Gender |
Male (ref) |
55.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Female |
44.2 |
1.97 |
[1.42-2.74] |
** |
1.48 |
[1.01-2.17] |
* |
|
Age |
Continuous |
45.6 |
1.00 |
[0.98-1.01] |
|
1.00 |
[0.98-1.01] |
|
|
Level of dependence
a
|
Category 5 (ref) |
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Category 1 |
20.6 |
17.45 |
[7.33-41.58] |
** |
16.40 |
[6.21-43.28] |
** |
| |
Category 2 |
25.3 |
7.79 |
[3.26-18.61] |
** |
6.45 |
[2.49-16.68] |
** |
| |
Category 3 |
22.0 |
5.29 |
[2.16-12.92] |
** |
4.13 |
[1.60-10.64] |
* |
| |
Category 4 |
15.5 |
1.84 |
[0.65-5.19] |
|
1.84 |
[0.63-5.41] |
|
|
Children |
No children (ref) |
86.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
At least one child |
13.7 |
6.93 |
[4.61-10.41] |
** |
3.42 |
[2.10-5.59] |
** |
|
Housing situation |
Institution (ref) |
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Private tenant |
21.3 |
5.18 |
[2.80-9.59] |
** |
0.85 |
[0.40-1.81] |
|
| |
Social tenant |
17.3 |
5.55 |
[2.95-10.44] |
** |
1.16 |
[0.55-2.47] |
|
| |
House owner |
34.8 |
5.17 |
[2.89-9.25] |
** |
0.68 |
[0.32-1.46] |
|
|
Employment |
Yes (ref) |
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No |
76.6 |
1.24 |
[0.83-1.85] |
|
2.64 |
[1.65-4.21] |
** |
|
Living situation |
Alone (ref) |
58.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not alone |
41.7 |
4.60 |
[3.23-6.53] |
** |
2.58 |
[1.46-4.54] |
** |
|
Partner |
No (ref) |
74.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Yes | 25.8 | 3.69 | [2.62-5.20] | ** | 1.52 | [0.88-2.64] | ||
*p = <0.05, **p = <0.001.
aIn Belgium, disabled people are assessed according to categories of dependence. These categories determine the financial allowance received and go from one, i.e. the lowest level of dependence, to five, i.e. the highest level of dependence.
bModel contains all variables from unadjusted analysis.