Table 1.
Snow regime | Year | DoY | Lower | Upper |
---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | 2008 | 158 | 156 | 161 |
Deep | 2008 | 175 | 172 | 177 |
Normal | 2009 | 153 | 150 | 156 |
Deep | 2009 | 170 | 167 | 172 |
Shallow | 2010 | 132 | 129 | 135 |
Normal | 2010 | 142 | 140 | 144 |
Medium | 2010 | 160 | 158 | 163 |
Deep | 2010 | 167 | 165 | 169 |
Shallow | 2011 | 150 | 147 | 152 |
Normal | 2011 | 155 | 153 | 157 |
Medium | 2011 | 162 | 159 | 164 |
Deep | 2011 | 166 | 164 | 168 |
Shallow | 2012 | 151 | 148 | 153 |
Normal | 2012 | 157 | 155 | 160 |
Medium | 2012 | 168 | 165 | 170 |
Deep | 2012 | 171 | 169 | 174 |
Shallow | Mean | 144 | ||
Normal | Mean | 153 | ||
Medium | Mean | 163 | ||
Deep | Mean | 170 |
The estimates of the all-years and all-regimes models were so similar that the results of both combined are shown here (see text for details). Normal: unmanipulated snow depth as found representative for most of the study area; Deep: manipulated snow depth with snow fences; Shallow: unmanipulated snow regime shallower than Normal as found on slightly elevated ridges throughout the study area; Medium: increased manipulated snow regime shallower than Deep.