Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 10;3(8):2711–2729. doi: 10.1002/ece3.664

Table 1.

Values used in SPA for this study

Parameter/Variable Symbol Units Value Source
Ambient atmospheric CO2 concentration Ca mmol mol−1 374 Value from recent past
Canopy layer capacitance Cn 2000 Williams et al. 35
Canopy hydraulic conductivity Gp mmol m−1 sec−1 MPa−1 3.5 Zeppel et al. 40
Layer height of soil H m 0.1–1.0 m depth, then 0.2–3.4 m Site estimate
Leaf area index LAI m−2 m2 0.1–2.3 MODIS LAI product
Areal concentration of leaf N N g m−2 ground area 0.16–3.65 Prior et al. 111 and Ghannoum et al. 109
Proportion of total canopy N in top layer Ntop 0.125 Zeppel et al. 40
Fine root radius rr M 0.0001 Zeppel et al. 40
Air temperature Ta °C Variable Zeppel et al. 40
Leaf temperature Ti °C Variable Zeppel et al. 40 and varied in scenarios
RuBP carboxylation capacity Vcmax μmol g−1 sec−1 27.4074 Zeppel et al. 40
Maximum electron transport rate Jmax μmol g−1 sec−1 48.1481 Zeppel et al. 40
δA/δgs threshold for stomatal opening Ι % 1.0007 Williams et al. 35
Minimum sustainable leaf water potential Ψlmin MPa −2.5 Kelley et al. 110
Soil water potential Ψs MPa −0.5 Predawn leaf water potential, estimated
% soil clay content in top 10 cm % 15.0 Zeppel et al. 40
% soil sand content in top 10 cm % 85.0 Zeppel et al. 40
Drain check – field capacity as fraction of total porosity Fraction 0.5 Zeppel et al. 40
Latitude ° 33° 39′ 42″
Dimension of leaves m2 0.08 Prior et al. 51
Root resistivity MPa sec g mmol−1 100 Estimated
Root biomass g 2450 Chen et al. 108
Rooting depth m 3.4 Chen et al. 108

SPA model input values indicating the name, symbol, units, value used, and whether the data were measured or estimated for the study site.