Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 12;18(3):355–359. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt518

Table 1:

Follow-up studies of BAV patients after isolated AVR surgery

Authors Sample size Study period BAV disease (AS vs AI)a Proximal aorta (mm) Follow-up (years) Type A dissection Sudden deaths
Russo et al. [36] 50 1975–1985 42% AS 18% AI Normal? 19.5 ± 3.9 5 (10%) 7 (14%)
Borger et al. [37] 201 1979–1993 63% AS 22% AI ≤50 mm 10.3 ± 3.8 1 (0.5%) 3 (2%)
Goland et al. [38] 252 1971–2000 50% AS 12% AI ≤50 mm 8.9 ± 6.3 0 (0%) 11 (6%)
McKellar et al. [39] 1286 1960–1995 77% AS 7% AI ? 12 (0–38) 13 (1%) ?
Dayan et al. [40] 60 2000–2003 83% AS 17% AI ≤45 mm 6.2 ± 2 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Girdauskas et al. [41] 153 1995–2001 100% AS 40–50 mm 11.5 ± 3.2 0 (0%) 3 (2%)

aPatients with mixed aortic valve lesions were not included.

AS: aortic valve stenosis; AI: aortic valve insufficiency; BAV: bicuspid aortic valve; AVR: aortic valve replacement.