Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 20;8(2):e2679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002679

Table 2. Summary of regression analysis between MF+ and a-MF patients.

Parameter Stimulus Associations with Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
αCD3/αCD28 MF/mg *, IVM 12 months **
IL-5 OV MF/mg **, MF+ **, IVM 12 months ** MF/mg (neg. correlation, p<0.001)
BmFE MF/mg **, MF+ * MF/mg (neg. correlation, p = 0.017)
BmFEtet MF/mg **, MF+ * MF/mg(neg. correlation, p = 0.004)
IL-13 αCD3/αCD28 MF/mg **, MF+ *
αCD3/αCD28 C∶A **, MF+ *, IVM 12 months ** C∶A (C↓A↑, p = 0.013)
OV C∶A **, MF+ **, IIT ** IIT (neg. correlation, p = 0.011)
IL-10 BmFE MF+ **, IIT ** MF-positive (pos↑neg↓, p = 0.005)
BmFEtet MF+ **, IIT ** IIT (neg. correlation, p = 0.003)
PPD C∶A *, MF+ **, IIT *
LPS C∶A **, MF+ *, IIT * C∶A (C↓A↑, p = 0.016)
OV C∶A (C↓A↑, p = 0.001) nd
BmFEtet IIT (neg. correlation, p = 0.014) nd
IL-6 wPAL C∶A **, IVM 12 months ** C∶A (C↓A↑, p<0.001)
WSP C∶A(C↓A↑, p = 0.007) nd
PPD C∶A **, IVM 12 months ** C∶A (C↓A↑, p = 0.001)
LPS C∶A **, MF+ *, IVM 12 months ** C∶A (C↓A↑, p = 0.015)
BmFE IIT **, IVM 12 months **
BmFEtet IIT (neg. Correlation, p = 0.02) nd
TNF wPAL C∶A **, MF+ ** C∶A (C↓A↑, p = 0.01)
WSP C∶A(C↓A↑, p = 0.038) nd
LPS C∶A **, MF+ *
αCD3/αCD28 C∶A **, MF/mg **, MF+ **, IIT **, IVM 12 months ** C∶A (C↓A↑, p<0.001)
IL-17 OV C∶A *, IIT **
BmFEtet C∶A **, IIT *, IVM 12 months * C∶A (C↓A↑, p = 0.01)
PPD C∶A **, MF+ * C∶A (C↓A↑, p = 0.017)
LPS C∶A **, IIT **, IVM 12 months ** C∶A (C↓A↑, p = 0.001)
IFN-γ PPD MF-positive (pos↓neg↑, p = 0.032)
In situ (plasma)
IgE nd
IgG4 C∶A(C↓A↑, p = 0.036) nd
IL-5 MF/mg **, MF+ **, IIT **, IVM 12 months ** MF/mg (pos. correlation, p<0.001)
Neutrophils MF/mg *, MF+ **, IIT * MF-positive (pos↓neg↑, p = 0.02)
Eosinophils MF/mg **, MF+ **, IIT ** MF/mg (pos. correlation, p<0.001)
ECP MF/mg **, MF+ ** MF/mg (pos. correlation, p<0.001)

C∶A denotes the Central∶Ashanti regional covariate. IIT denotes the number of times an individual had received IVM therapy.

*

denotes p<0.1.

**

denotes p<0.05.

‘nd’ denotes that only one covariate was below p<0.1 and therefore no multivariable analysis was done. ‘—’ denotes that no dominant factor was found in the multivariable analysis. Data were assessed using a generalized linear model analysis using the parameters “IIT”, “IVM intake within the last 12 months”, “MF-positivity”, “microfilarial density - Mf/mg” and “Central∶Ashanti” as covariates. The latter denotes a regional distribution covariate consisting of 14 villages (82 participants) in the Central region and 10 villages (128 individuals) in the Ashanti region. If more than one covariate had a p<0.1 following univariate analysis (depicted in italics), a further multivariable stage was conducted in order to identify the highest correlating factor.