Table 3. Final multivariable model of associations with loss to follow-up (n = 379).

		Hazard Ratio	P value of association with LTFU (LRT)	Adjusted Hazard Ratio	P value of association with LTFU (LRT)
Stigma	0–35	1.00	0.28	1.00	0.06
	36–41	0.68 (0.37–1.26)		0.77 (0.41–1.46)
	42–47	1.12 (0.68–1.85)		1.20 (0.71–2.04)
	48+	0.77 (0.45–1.34)		0.62 (0.35–1.11)
Age		0.96 (0.94–0.98)	<0.01	0.96 (0.93–0.99)	<0.01
Gender	Female	1.00	0.41	1.00	<0.01
	Male	1.18 (0.80–1.74)		2.12 (1.36–3.31)
Social support – open with friends/family	Not at all	1.00	<0.01	1.00	<0.01
	A little	1.32 (0.74–2.35)		1.34 (0.74–2.42)
	A lot	2.78 (1.61–4.81)		3.88 (2.17–6.92)
Number of children	None	1.00	0.02	1.00	0.01
	1 child	0.45 (0.22–0.91)		0.28 (0.13–0.58)
	2 children	0.44 (0.23–0.86)		0.48 (0.24–0.96)
	3 children	0.69 (0.36–1.33)		0.69 (0.34–1.38)
	4+ children	0.35 (0.19–0.67)		0.41 (0.19–0.86)
Social capital - community working together	Individual/neighbours	1.00	0.06	1.00	0.02
	Traditional leaders	0.86 (0.38–1.94)		1.64 (0.71–3.84)
	Municipal/district leaders	1.63 (0.77–3.45)		2.52 (1.16–5.47)
	Traditional and municipal/district leaders	1.37 (0.63–3.01)		3.06 (1.31–7.17)
Social support – rely on family/friends	A little/not at all	1.00	0.11	1.00	0.01
	A lot	0.70 (0.47–1.05)		0.53 (0.34–0.83)