Table 1.
Author, Year | N | Study setting | % Womena | Race/ethnicitya | Data Collection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National | |||||
Banerjea, 2008 (27) | 4,256 | MEPS 2003 | 100% | NR | Self-report via in-person interview |
Chang, 2010 (28) | 37,864 | VA and MCBS | NR | NR | Self-report via in-person interview (MCBS); medical record review (VA) |
Chao, 2004 (30) | 129,246 | Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort | 55% | White: 98%b Black: 1% |
Self-report via mailed survey |
Heo, 2004 (32) | 84,284 | BRFSS 2001 | 62% | White: 82% | Self-report via telephone interview |
Ioannou, 2003 (17) | 58,915 | BRFSS 1999 | 61% | White: 85% Black: 6% Hispanic: 5.9% Asian: 1% |
Self-report via telephone interview |
Leone, 2010 (34) | 7,469 | NHIS 2005 | 100% | White: 86% Black: 14% |
Self-report via in-person interview |
Liang, 2006 (13) | 11,779 | NHIS 2003c | NR | NR | Self-report via in-person interview |
McQueen, 2006 (37) | 2,686 | HINTS | 63% | White: 74% | Self-report via telephone interview |
Wee, 2005 (15) | 11,427 | NHIS 2000 | NR | NR | Self-report via in-person interview |
Yancy, 2010 (44) | 1,699,219d | VA 2000–2005 | NR | NR | Medical record review |
Regional | |||||
Ferrante, 2006 (31) | 1,297 | Mid-Atlantic primary care practices | 49% | White: 80%e Black: 9% Asian/Pacific Islander: 3% Other: 8% Hispanic: 4% |
Medical record review |
Matthews, 2007 (36) | 104 | Midwestern medical clinics | 68% | White: 62% Black: 47.8% |
Self-report via in-person interview and verification by medical record review |
Muus, 2009 (38) | 2,447 | National Resource Center on Native American Aging | 0% | Native American: 100% | Self-report via in-person interview |
Slattery, 2004 (40) | 2,479 | Controls from HMO (Northern California) and community-based (Utah) case-control study | 45% | White: 82–87% | In-person self-report of weight, measured height |
Tessaro, 2006 (41) | 802 | 16 Appalachian churches | 65% | White: 98% | Self-administered survey completed in church |
State | |||||
James, 2008 (33) | 378 | Churches in rural North Carolina | 72% | Black: 100% | Self-report via telephone interview |
Lian, 2008 (35) | 2,987 | BRFSS 2006 (Missouri) | 62% | White: 87% Black: 7% Hispanic: 5% |
Self-report via telephone interview |
Menis, 2006 (18) | 3,017 | Maryland Cancer Survey 2002 | 62% | White: 79% Black: 17% Other: 4% |
Self-report via telephone interview |
Satia, 2007 (39) | 405 | North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles rosters | 56% | Black: 100% | Self-report via mailed survey, telephone, or Internet |
Yang, 2009 (45) | 2,478 | BRFSS 2004–06 (Nevada) | NR | White: 85%b Hispanic: 15% |
Self-report via telephone interview |
Local | |||||
Chao, 1987 (29) | 11,888 | Retirement community-based cohort study in Southern California | 64% | Predominantly White | Self-report via mailed survey |
Vlahov, 2005 (42) | 5,362 | New York Cancer Project (New York City) | 67% | White: 55.9% Black: 14.7% Asian: 10.3% Hispanic: 15.2% |
Self-report via in-person interview |
Winkleby, 2003 (43) | 98 | Monterrey County (California) in residential community and agricultural camp | 55%b | Latino: 100% | Self-report via telephone interview (men and women) and in-person interview (men in agricultural camp) |
Abbreviations: NR, not reported; VA, Veterans’ Administration; MCBS, Medicare Beneficiary Survey; BRFSS, Behavior Risk Factor and Surveillance Survey; NHIS, National Health Interview Survey; HINTS, Health Information Trends Survey
Proportion based on obesity-colon cancer screening analysis.
Proportions calculated using results kindly provided by authors.
Results presented for NHIS 2003 since other studies provided results from NHIS 2000
Number of participants in entire study population and not limited to obesity-colon cancer screening analysis
Racial composition of included practices, not specifically for the study population