Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov;49(5):829–836. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0178OC

TABLE 1.

QUANTITATIVE OVERVIEW OF BONE LOSS ACCORDING TO MICRO-CT IMAGING

Parameter Saline (n = 3) ODE (n = 4) LPS (n = 4) PGN (n = 4) ANOVA (P Value)
Bone mineral density (g/mm3) 0.63 ± 0.03 0.48 ± 0.04* 0.43 ± 0.02*,† 0.53 ± 0.06* 0.000
Percent bone volume 51.38 ± 2.54 38.40 ± 2.80* 34.65 ± 1.86*,† 43.50 ± 5.46* 0.000
Specific bone surface (mm−1) 39.95 ± 4.13 48.07 ± 4.21 52.76 ± 1.26*,† 43.79 ± 7.57 0.027
Trabecular pattern factor (mm−1) −0.83 ± 1.93 4.75 ± 0.20* 4.75 ± 1.92* 2.81 ± 2.57* 0.008
Structural model index 0.53 ± 0.27 1.09 ± 0.07* 0.95 ± 0.15* 0.96 ± 0.22* 0.012
Trabecular thickness (mm) 0.091 ± 0.007 0.080 ± 0.008 0.073 ± 0.002*,† 0.087 ± 0.011 0.042
Trabecular number (mm−1) 5.64 ± 0.16 4.76 ± 0.19* 4.73 ± 0.26* 5.01 ± 0.40* 0.005
Trabecular separation (mm) 0.11 ± 0.007 0.13 ± 0.005 0.12 ± 0.004 0.12 ± 0.014 0.094
Polar moment of inertia (mm4) 0.0030 ± 0.00010 0.0020 ± 0.00017* 0.0017 ± 0.00008*,†,‡ 0.0022 ± 0.00027* 0.000

Definition of abbreviations: micro-CT, micro–computed tomography; ODE, organic dust extract; PGN, peptidoglycan.

*P < 0.05, P < 0.05, and P < 0.05 represent statistical significance versus saline, PGN, and ODE, respectively, using least significance difference (LSD) as post hoc test for multiple comparisons within the groups. Data are represented as means ± SDs.