Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 10;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-13

Table 1.

The 95% confidence bounds of the coefficients of the power law function fitted to normalized response latency and the mean absolute ERROR for each tDCS group: M1, cerebellar, sham

 
Response latency
a (95% confidence bounds)
b (95% confidence bounds)
SSE
R-square
RMSE
Cerebellar tDCS
3.011 (2.476,3.546)
-0.2806 (-0.4182,-0.143)
1.091
0.4579
0.2462
M1 tDCS
3.158 (2.542,3.775)
-0.2426 (-0.3924,-0.09276)
1.557
0.3107
0.2941
Sham tDCS
2.951 (2.287,3.614)
-0.1952 (-0.366,-0.0243)
1.977
0.148
0.3314
Mean absolute error
a (95% confidence bounds)
b (95% confidence bounds)
SSE
R-square
RMSE
Cerebellar tDCS
0.1013 (0.07503,0.1275)
-0.3808 (-0.5862,-0.1754)
0.002164
0.3767
0.01097
M1 tDCS
0.1498 (0.1086,0.191)
-0.8368 (-1.082,-0.5918)
0.002198
0.7172
0.01105
Sham tDCS 0.1671 (0.1212,0.2129) -0.9265 (-1.177,-0.676) 0.002279 0.758 0.01125

Power law function: f(x) = a*xb; SSE: sum of squares due to error; R-square: coefficient of determination; RMSE: root mean squared error (standard error).